Direct evidence that GM-CSF inhalation improves lung clearance in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

Summary Background Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is caused by granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibodies in the lung. Previously, we reported that GM-CSF inhalation therapy improved alveolar-arterial oxygen difference and serum biomarkers of disease s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2012-02, Vol.106 (2), p.284-293
Hauptverfasser: Ohashi, Kazumasa, Sato, Atsuyasu, Takada, Toshinori, Arai, Toru, Nei, Takahito, Kasahara, Yasunori, Motoi, Natsuki, Hojo, Masayuki, Urano, Shinya, Ishii, Haruyuki, Yokoba, Masanori, Eda, Ryosuke, Nakayama, Hideaki, Nasuhara, Yasuyuki, Tsuchihashi, Yoshiko, Kaneko, Chinatsu, Kanazawa, Hiroko, Ebina, Masahito, Yamaguchi, Etsuro, Kirchner, Jacqueline, Inoue, Yoshikazu, Nakata, Koh, Tazawa, Ryushi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is caused by granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibodies in the lung. Previously, we reported that GM-CSF inhalation therapy improved alveolar-arterial oxygen difference and serum biomarkers of disease severity in these patients. It is plausible that inhaled GM-CSF improves the dysfunction of alveolar macrophages and promotes the clearance of the surfactant. However, effect of the therapy on components in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) remains unclear. Objectives To figure out changes in surfactant clearance during GM-CSF inhalation therapy. Methods We performed retrospective analyses of BALF obtained under a standardized protocol from the same bronchus in each of 19 aPAP patients before and after GM-CSF inhalation therapy (ISRCTN18931678, JMA-IIA00013; total dose 10.5–21 mg, duration 12–24 weeks). For evaluation, the participants were divided into two groups, high responders with improvement in alveolar-arterial oxygen difference ≥13 mmHg ( n  = 10) and low responders with that 
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.019