Prognosis for Live Birth in Women With Recurrent Miscarriage: What Is the Best Measure of Success?
OBJECTIVE:To establish a method of estimating the proportion of women with a subsequent live birth after a well-defined time period in an open cohort of women referred to a tertiary recurrent miscarriage clinic. METHODS:We performed a descriptive cohort study with register-based follow-up at a terti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2012-01, Vol.119 (1), p.37-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To establish a method of estimating the proportion of women with a subsequent live birth after a well-defined time period in an open cohort of women referred to a tertiary recurrent miscarriage clinic.
METHODS:We performed a descriptive cohort study with register-based follow-up at a tertiary center for investigation and treatment of recurrent miscarriage in Denmark. All women with primary or secondary recurrent miscarriage referred to the clinic from 1986 to 2008 were included in the study (n=987). Main outcome measures were age-specific and miscarriage-specific proportions of women with a live birth after the first consultation and similar hazard ratios compared with the prognosis in women aged 30–34 years with three miscarriages before the first consultation.
RESULTS:Five years after the first consultation, 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.7–69.7) had achieved a live birth, increasing to 71.1% (95% CI 68.0–74.2) 15 years after the first consultation. There was a significantly decreased chance of at least one subsequent live birth with increasing maternal age (log-rank P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
DOI: | 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823c0413 |