Trends and transient change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recording: studies of sequential and longitudinal collected primary care data

Summary Background:  End‐digit preference (EDP) is a known cause of inaccurate BP recording. Distortion has been reported around pay‐for‐performance (P4P) indicators. Methods:  We studied sequential datasets (n = 148,000 to n = 900,000) and performed a longitudinal analysis of CONDUIT data (n = 250,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2012-01, Vol.66 (1), p.37-43
Hauptverfasser: Alsanjari, O. N., de Lusignan, S., van Vlymen, J., Gallagher, H., Millett, C., Harris, K., Majeed, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background:  End‐digit preference (EDP) is a known cause of inaccurate BP recording. Distortion has been reported around pay‐for‐performance (P4P) indicators. Methods:  We studied sequential datasets (n = 148,000 to n = 900,000) and performed a longitudinal analysis of CONDUIT data (n = 250,000) over a 10‐year period. We examined general trends in EDP and investigated the impact of diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) P4P targets. Results:  EDP reduces over time in both datasets; the percentage of patients with a zero EDP declined from 70% to 27% and 68% to 26% for SBP and DBP respectively. There is more zero EDP at the extremes of BP, but in people with chronic disease, the use of zero EDP was mainly seen at higher BP levels. P4P targets are associated with increased preference for the even end‐digit just below target: in diabetes odds ratio (OR) is 1.47 (p = 0.003) for SBP, 1.19 (p = 0.09) for DBP and in CKD OR 1.65 (p 
ISSN:1368-5031
1742-1241
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02781.x