Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy

Purpose This study was conducted to compare recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex with succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Methods Seventeen patients who were scheduled to undergo ECT were studied. Anesthe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2011-12, Vol.25 (6), p.855-859
Hauptverfasser: Kadoi, Yuji, Hoshi, Hiroko, Nishida, Akiko, Saito, Shigeru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study was conducted to compare recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex with succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Methods Seventeen patients who were scheduled to undergo ECT were studied. Anesthesia was induced by use of propofol (1.0 mg/kg) followed by either succinylcholine (SCC) (1 mg/kg) or rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Assisted mask ventilation was initiated with 100% oxygen. After T1 was assessed as being zero by neuromuscular monitoring, an electroshock stimulus was applied bilaterally. Patients receiving rocuronium were infused with 16, 8, or 4 mg/kg sugammadex immediately after the seizure stopped to reverse the muscle relaxation. Neuromuscular monitoring was continued until recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 at the tibial nerve in the leg. The times to recovery of T1 to 10 and 90% with both relaxants were compared. Results The time to recovery of T1 to 90% after 16 mg/kg sugammadex was shorter than that in subjects treated with SCC ( p  = 0.046), whereas that after 4 mg/kg sugammadex was longer than that in subjects treated with SCC (SCC group: 429 ± 65 s, 16 mg/kg sugammadex group: 387 ± 63 s*, 8 mg/kg sugammadex group: 462 ± 66 s, 4 mg/kg sugammadex group: 563 ± 45 s* ,# ; * p  
ISSN:0913-8668
1438-8359
DOI:10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y