Quality of life in oral cancer patients – Effects of mandible resection and socio-cultural aspects

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative quality of life in oral cancer patients depending on different mandible resection types and to collect information about their socio-cultural situation. Material and methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with prima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2012-01, Vol.40 (1), p.24-27
Hauptverfasser: Becker, Stephan T, Menzebach, Marc, Küchler, Thomas, Hertrampf, Katrin, Wenz, Hans-Jürgen, Wiltfang, Jörg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative quality of life in oral cancer patients depending on different mandible resection types and to collect information about their socio-cultural situation. Material and methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with primary oral cancer treated with different types of mandibular resection in the Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University of Kiel between 1997 and 2007 were included. Quality of life was assessed by means of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N 35 questionnaires. Furthermore, a questionnaire about the socio-cultural background of the patients was applied. To be included, at least one year had to be passed after tumour resection. Results 111 of 235 questionnaires were returned (47%). Significant differences in quality of life were found between patients with soft tissue resections and bone resections. There were significant worse values for continuity resections compared to only partial resections. Sixty-seven patients (60.4%) had a graduation of an elementary school as the highest school graduation, four patients (3%) had no school graduation. Conclusions The postoperative quality of life in our patients was significantly influenced by the extent of bone resection. This should be considered for surgical planning. The socio-cultural data showed a rather low education level for the majority of the patients.
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.021