Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the zero-tolerance era

Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most common health care‒associated infections in the critical care setting. Methods A quasi-experimental study involving multiple interventions to reduce the incidence of CAUTI was conducted in a medical-surgical intensive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2011-12, Vol.39 (10), p.817-822
Hauptverfasser: Marra, Alexandre R., MD, Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Zinsly, MD, Gonçalves, Priscila, RN, Sogayar, Ana Maria Cristina B., MD, Moura, Denis Faria, RN, Guastelli, Luciana Reis, RN, Alves Rosa, Carla Andrea C., RN, da Silva Victor, Elivane, PhD, Pavão dos Santos, Oscar Fernando, MD, Edmond, Michael B., MD, MPH, MPA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most common health care‒associated infections in the critical care setting. Methods A quasi-experimental study involving multiple interventions to reduce the incidence of CAUTI was conducted in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) and in 2 step-down units (SDUs). Between June 2005 and December 2007 (phase 1), we implemented some Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‒recommended evidence-based practices. Between January 2008 and July 2010 (phase 2), we intervened to improve compliance with these practices at the same time that performance monitoring was being done at the bedside, and we implemented the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s bladder bundle for all ICU and SDU patients requiring urinary catheters. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in the rate of CAUTI in the ICU, from 7.6 per 1,000 catheter-days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6-8.6) before the intervention to 5.0 per 1,000 catheter-days (95% CI, 4.2-5.8; P < .001) after the intervention. There also was a statistically significant reduction in the rate of CAUTI in the SDUs, from 15.3 per 1,000 catheter-days (95% CI, 13.9-16.6) before the intervention to 12.9 per 1,000 catheter-days (95% CI, 11.6-14.2) after the intervention ( P = .014). Conclusion Our findings suggest that reducing CAUTI rates in the ICU setting is a complex process that involves multiple performance measures and interventions that can be applied to SDU settings as well.
ISSN:0196-6553
1527-3296
DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.013