INTEGRALITY GAPS OF 2 ― o(1) FOR VERTEX COVER SDPs IN THE LOVÁSZ―SCHRIJVER HIERARCHY
Linear and semidefinite programming are highly successful approaches for obtaining good approximations for NP-hard optimization problems. For example, breakthrough approximation algorithms for Max Cut and Sparsest Cut use semidefinite programming. Perhaps the most prominent NP-hard problem whose exa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | SIAM journal on computing 2010-01, Vol.39 (7-8), p.3553-3570 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Linear and semidefinite programming are highly successful approaches for obtaining good approximations for NP-hard optimization problems. For example, breakthrough approximation algorithms for Max Cut and Sparsest Cut use semidefinite programming. Perhaps the most prominent NP-hard problem whose exact approximation factor is still unresolved is Vertex Cover. Probabilistically checkable proof (PCP)-based techniques of Dinur and Safra show that it is not possible to achieve a factor better than 1.36; on the other hand no known algorithm does better than the factor of 2 achieved by the simple greedy algorithm. There is a widespread belief that semidefinite programming (SDP) techniques are the most promising methods available for improving upon this factor of 2. Following a line of study initiated by Arora et al., the authors aim is to show that a large family of linear programming (LP)- and SDP-based algorithms fail to produce an approximation for Vertex Cover better than 2. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0097-5397 1095-7111 |
DOI: | 10.1137/080721479 |