Can 'negative net CO sub(2) emissions' from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland"s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?

The article analyses to what extent 'negative net CO sub(2) emissions' from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity can contribute to solving Poland's carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas. From the criteria-based evaluation of low-carbon power technologies it is found, that biogas-to-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2011-11, Vol.36 (11), p.6318-6325
1. Verfasser: Budzianowski, Wojciech Marcin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article analyses to what extent 'negative net CO sub(2) emissions' from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity can contribute to solving Poland's carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas. From the criteria-based evaluation of low-carbon power technologies it is found, that biogas-to-electricity is among technologies having increasing production potential in Poland. Therefore, in future biogas will be able to contribute to solving Poland's CCS dilemmas, because it offers carbon-neutral electricity. Moreover, by applying CCS into biogas-to-electricity the 'negative net CO sub(2) emissions' can be achieved. The article examines three biogas-to-electricity technologies involving CO sub(2) capture, i.e. biogas-to-biomethane, biogas-to-CHP and biogas-to-electricity via the ORFC cycle. It is emphasised that the ORFC cycle offers low-cost CO sub(2) separation from a CO sub(2)-H sub(2) mixture, low O sub(2)-intensity, and the opportunities for advanced mass and energy integration of involved processes. Besides, energy conversion calculations show that the ORFC cycle can offer comparable cycle efficiency with air- and oxy-combustion combined cycles. In regard to the design of biogas-based energy systems it is recommended to include (i) distributed production of biogas in order to avoid costs of long-distance transportation of high-moisture content biomass and (ii) centralised large-scale decarbonised biogas-to-electricity power plants since costs of pipeline transportation of gases are low but large-scale plants could benefit from increased energy and CCS efficiencies.
ISSN:0360-5442
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.047