Abciximab and Heparin versus Bivalirudin for Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
This trial compared the combination of abciximab and unfractionated heparin with bivalirudin in patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI who were undergoing coronary stenting. The two regimens had similar efficacy, but there was more bleeding with abciximab and heparin. An invasive strategy of coro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2011-11, Vol.365 (21), p.1980-1989 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This trial compared the combination of abciximab and unfractionated heparin with bivalirudin in patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI who were undergoing coronary stenting. The two regimens had similar efficacy, but there was more bleeding with abciximab and heparin.
An invasive strategy of coronary angiography, with revascularization when appropriate, is recommended for high-risk patients who have an acute coronary syndrome.
1
,
2
Owing to the key role that the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, which is highly prothrombotic, plays in the pathogenesis of these syndromes,
3
identifying the most appropriate adjunctive antithrombotic therapy before, during, and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been the target of extensive research for the past three decades.
Abciximab is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with potent platelet-antiaggregative effects.
4
Although the administration of abciximab during PCI was not associated with a clinical benefit in patients in stable . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1109596 |