Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-12, Vol.112 (6), p.e137-e142
1. Verfasser: Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e142
container_issue 6
container_start_page e137
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics
container_volume 112
creator Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD
description Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods ( P < .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant. Conclusions Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1079210411003714</els_id><sourcerecordid>905675755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-e5dfd398306809e35ce783105dddd21f4674c20578902bf240546e192256bdc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYpeFnwDqDTi0OK-muYDQiJe0CAlYiVuUpq7I0DazSQqaf0-qGThwIRdHymc7_kzIYwoNBdq-2Dc5-sOEoWFAaQOyAcHukEsqWVdzLb_dLXdQumYUxAV5kNIeAFqu9X1ywWinOHTqktzsjjm4MB9s9r2ffD5WYawW_FX1PjiMdvau7m3CoZptxujtlKqwVN_X2S7V6PsY-smmXDmcysuzj593tXz-kNwbC4iPzvGK3Lx983X3vr7-9O7D7vV17UQnc41yGAeuOw5tBxq5dKg6TkEO5TA6ilYJx0CqTgPrRyZAihapZky2_eAEvyJPT3UPMdyumLKZfdp-YhcMazIaZKukkrKQ8kS6GFKKOJpD9LONR0PBbELN3pyFmk2oAWmK0JL35Nxh7Wcc_mb9MViAVycAy5w_PUaTnMfF4eAjumyG4P_b4uU_FdzkF-_s9AOPmPZhjUuRaKhJzID5sm11WyqlAFxRwX8DU_udiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905675755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods ( P &lt; .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant. Conclusions Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-2104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-395X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21873087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology ; Calcium Compounds - chemistry ; Calcium Compounds - pharmacology ; Calcium Hydroxide - chemistry ; Calcium Hydroxide - pharmacology ; Calcium Phosphates - chemistry ; Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology ; Cell Line ; Cell Proliferation - drug effects ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Coloring Agents ; Culture Media ; Dentistry ; Durapatite - chemistry ; Durapatite - pharmacology ; Fibroblasts - drug effects ; Humans ; Humidity ; Hydroxyapatites - chemistry ; Hydroxyapatites - pharmacology ; Nanocomposites - chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology ; Silicates - chemistry ; Silicates - pharmacology ; Surgery ; Temperature ; Tetrazolium Salts ; Thiazoles ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-12, Vol.112 (6), p.e137-e142</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-e5dfd398306809e35ce783105dddd21f4674c20578902bf240546e192256bdc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-e5dfd398306809e35ce783105dddd21f4674c20578902bf240546e192256bdc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1079210411003714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21873087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><description>Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods ( P &lt; .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant. Conclusions Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Coloring Agents</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - chemistry</subject><subject>Durapatite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatites - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatites - pharmacology</subject><subject>Nanocomposites - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Silicates - chemistry</subject><subject>Silicates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Tetrazolium Salts</subject><subject>Thiazoles</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1079-2104</issn><issn>1528-395X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYpeFnwDqDTi0OK-muYDQiJe0CAlYiVuUpq7I0DazSQqaf0-qGThwIRdHymc7_kzIYwoNBdq-2Dc5-sOEoWFAaQOyAcHukEsqWVdzLb_dLXdQumYUxAV5kNIeAFqu9X1ywWinOHTqktzsjjm4MB9s9r2ffD5WYawW_FX1PjiMdvau7m3CoZptxujtlKqwVN_X2S7V6PsY-smmXDmcysuzj593tXz-kNwbC4iPzvGK3Lx983X3vr7-9O7D7vV17UQnc41yGAeuOw5tBxq5dKg6TkEO5TA6ilYJx0CqTgPrRyZAihapZky2_eAEvyJPT3UPMdyumLKZfdp-YhcMazIaZKukkrKQ8kS6GFKKOJpD9LONR0PBbELN3pyFmk2oAWmK0JL35Nxh7Wcc_mb9MViAVycAy5w_PUaTnMfF4eAjumyG4P_b4uU_FdzkF-_s9AOPmPZhjUuRaKhJzID5sm11WyqlAFxRwX8DU_udiw</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)</title><author>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-e5dfd398306809e35ce783105dddd21f4674c20578902bf240546e192256bdc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Coloring Agents</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - chemistry</topic><topic>Durapatite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatites - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatites - pharmacology</topic><topic>Nanocomposites - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Silicates - chemistry</topic><topic>Silicates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Tetrazolium Salts</topic><topic>Thiazoles</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e137</spage><epage>e142</epage><pages>e137-e142</pages><issn>1079-2104</issn><eissn>1528-395X</eissn><abstract>Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods ( P &lt; .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant. Conclusions Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21873087</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-2104
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-12, Vol.112 (6), p.e137-e142
issn 1079-2104
1528-395X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675755
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology
Calcium Compounds - chemistry
Calcium Compounds - pharmacology
Calcium Hydroxide - chemistry
Calcium Hydroxide - pharmacology
Calcium Phosphates - chemistry
Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology
Cell Line
Cell Proliferation - drug effects
Cell Survival - drug effects
Ceramics - chemistry
Coloring Agents
Culture Media
Dentistry
Durapatite - chemistry
Durapatite - pharmacology
Fibroblasts - drug effects
Humans
Humidity
Hydroxyapatites - chemistry
Hydroxyapatites - pharmacology
Nanocomposites - chemistry
Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry
Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology
Silicates - chemistry
Silicates - pharmacology
Surgery
Temperature
Tetrazolium Salts
Thiazoles
Time Factors
title Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A48%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytocompatibility%20of%20new%20bioceramic-based%20materials%20on%20human%20fibroblast%20cells%20(MRC-5)&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology,%20oral%20radiology%20and%20endodontics&rft.au=Mukhtar-Fayyad,%20Dalia,%20BDS,%20MSc,%20PhD&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e137&rft.epage=e142&rft.pages=e137-e142&rft.issn=1079-2104&rft.eissn=1528-395X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905675755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905675755&rft_id=info:pmid/21873087&rft_els_id=S1079210411003714&rfr_iscdi=true