Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5)

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-12, Vol.112 (6), p.e137-e142
1. Verfasser: Mukhtar-Fayyad, Dalia, BDS, MSc, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based materials, BioAggregate and iRoot, on human fibroblast MRC-5 cells. Study design Twenty-four disks of BioAggregate and iRoot SP materials were fabricated (2 × 5 mm). Disks were immersed in cell culture medium at 37°C for 5 days, and the extracts obtained were diluted with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle medium to achieve 5 concentrations (neat, 1/2, 1/10, 1/50, 1/100). Human fibroblast cells were incubated with each extract dilution for 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days, then cellular viability was assessed using MTT assay. Differences in mean cell viability values between materials were assessed by using the 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental materials and the control group and between the 2 materials at the neat, 1/2, 1/10 concentrations for the 3 incubation periods ( P < .001). The cytotoxic effect of both materials was concentration dependant. Conclusions Both BioAggregate and iRoot SP displayed an acceptable biocompatibility.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.042