Characterization of geometric uncertainties of a dose calibrator during measurement of 90Y activity

The performance and measurement of (90)Y with a dose calibrator has always been a key point of several international recommendations, specifically in the case of the radiopharmaceutical (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, among other applications, used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The objective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear medicine technology 2011-06, Vol.39 (2), p.125-130
Hauptverfasser: Santos, João A M, Dias, Anabela G, Bastos, Artur L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The performance and measurement of (90)Y with a dose calibrator has always been a key point of several international recommendations, specifically in the case of the radiopharmaceutical (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, among other applications, used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The objective of the present work was to examine in detail some important sources of geometric errors that, if neglected, can lead to an increase in uncertainty about the measured activity of this β(-) emitter radionuclide. A CRC-15R dose calibrator was used to measure and quantify some of these sources, although the same methodology can easily be applied to any other similar equipment. The depth response along the main axis of the dose calibrator was carefully characterized, as well as syringe volume effects and source angular dependence. It was found that, if not taken properly into account, these issues can contribute to an increase in the activity uncertainty (e.g., 5.1% in the present example). This finding implies the possibility of easily reaching higher values than the internationally suggested 5% uncertainty in activity measurement for therapeutic purposes. These errors can be greatly reduced by previous characterization of the dose calibrator and careful implementation of the methodology for measurement.
ISSN:0091-4916
1535-5675
DOI:10.2967/jnmt.110.077404