Distribution of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes using a commercial DNA micro-array system
Summary Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes are distributed worldwide and their epidemiology is complex. Using the Check-ESBL assay, the distribution of class A ESBL genes in clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli from three laboratories in the East of The Netherlands was deter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2011-12, Vol.79 (4), p.349-353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes are distributed worldwide and their epidemiology is complex. Using the Check-ESBL assay, the distribution of class A ESBL genes in clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli from three laboratories in the East of The Netherlands was determined. Four patient categories were distinguished: (i) patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU); (ii) non-ICU inpatients; (iii) outpatients admitted less than a year before collection of the isolate, (1). From February 2009 until March 2010, out of 491 putative ESBL-positive isolates detected by the Vitek2 or Phoenix automated sensitivity testing systems, ESBL genes were detected in 247 (50.3%) by the Check–ESBL assay. Of these, 116 were from hospitalized patients (35 ICU, 81 non-ICU) and 131 were from outpatients (43 1). In all, 274 ESBL genes were identified in these 247 isolates: 153 CTX-M-1 group (predominantly in E. coli and K. pneumoniae , 70.4% and 51.6% respectively), 67 CTX-M-9 group (predominantly in E. cloacae , 57.9%), 32 SHV, 14 TEM and 8 CTX-M-2 group. ESBL-producing E. cloacae were significantly more common in hospitalized patients than in outpatients, 20.7% and 3.8% respectively ( P = 0.001). CTX-M-9 group ESBLs were significantly more prevalent in ICU patients ( P = 0.003), whereas SHV ESBLs were more common in hospitalized patients than in outpatients ( P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in distribution of ESBL genes between the two outpatient groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.005 |