Traumatic damage to the cartilage influences outcome of anatomically reduced acetabular fractures: A medium-term retrospective analysis

Abstract We reviewed 77 patients with an acetabular fracture, treated operatively through a non-extensile approach after an average time of 45 months. The ilioinguinal approach was chosen in 41, the Kocher–Langenbeck approach in 36 patients. Following the Letournel classification, the most frequent lesions were posterior wall (26%), two-column (22.1%) and anterior column (14.3%) fractures. Subchondral impaction, intra-articular fracture fragments and fracture comminution, called modifiers, could be identified in the preoperative CT-data of 38 patients (49.4%). Patients were operated after an average of 4 days. Average hospital stay was 19 days. Sciatic nerve and peroneal nerve palsy were registered in 5.6%. Deep venous thrombosis was seen in 10.4%, peri-articular ossifications in 7.8%. During the 45-months follow-up, 10.4% patients needed secondary total hip arthroplasty. Using the Merle d’Aubigné score, 15 patients had an excellent, 39 a good, 15 a moderate, and 8 a bad result. In accordance with the Harris Hip Score, 29 patients achieved an excellent, 26 a good, 9 a moderate and 13 a bad result. Twenty of twenty-three (Merle d’Aubigné score) and twenty of twenty-two (Harris Hop Score) patients with moderate or bad results had one or more modifiers. Patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures, who had CT-findings such as subchondral impaction, fracture comminution or intra-articular fracture fragments in their preoperative examination, score significantly lower at middle term in the Harris Hip and Merle d’Aubigné scoring systems.