Analytical comparison of nine PCR primer sets designed to detect the presence of Escherichia coli/ Shigella in water samples

The analytical performance of 9 different PCR primer sets designed to detect Escherichia coli and Shigella in water has been evaluated in terms of ubiquity, specificity, and analytical detection limit. Of the 9 PCR primer sets tested, only 3 of the 5 primer sets targeting uidA gene and the primer se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2009-07, Vol.43 (12), p.3019-3028
Hauptverfasser: Maheux, Andrée F., Picard, François J., Boissinot, Maurice, Bissonnette, Luc, Paradis, Sonia, Bergeron, Michel G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The analytical performance of 9 different PCR primer sets designed to detect Escherichia coli and Shigella in water has been evaluated in terms of ubiquity, specificity, and analytical detection limit. Of the 9 PCR primer sets tested, only 3 of the 5 primer sets targeting uidA gene and the primer set targeting tuf gene amplified DNA from all E. coli strains tested. However, of those 4 primer sets, only the primer set targeting the tuf gene also amplified DNA from all Shigella strains tested. For the specificity, only the primer sets targeting the uidA gene were 100% specific although the primer sets targeting 16S rRNA, phoE, and tuf genes only amplified Escherichia fergusonii as non-specific target. Finally, the primer set targeting the 16S-ITS-23S gene region, was not specific as it amplified DNA from many other Enterobacteriaceae species. In summary, only the assay targeting the tuf gene detected all E. coli/ Shigella strains tested in this study. However, if it becomes important to discriminate between E. coli and E. fergusonii, assays targeting the uidA gene would represent a good choice although none of them were totally ubiquitous to detect of the presence of Shigella strains.
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.017