Analytical comparison of nine PCR primer sets designed to detect the presence of Escherichia coli/ Shigella in water samples
The analytical performance of 9 different PCR primer sets designed to detect Escherichia coli and Shigella in water has been evaluated in terms of ubiquity, specificity, and analytical detection limit. Of the 9 PCR primer sets tested, only 3 of the 5 primer sets targeting uidA gene and the primer se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2009-07, Vol.43 (12), p.3019-3028 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The analytical performance of 9 different PCR primer sets designed to detect
Escherichia coli and
Shigella in water has been evaluated in terms of ubiquity, specificity, and analytical detection limit. Of the 9 PCR primer sets tested, only 3 of the 5 primer sets targeting
uidA gene and the primer set targeting
tuf gene amplified DNA from all
E. coli strains tested. However, of those 4 primer sets, only the primer set targeting the
tuf gene also amplified DNA from all
Shigella strains tested. For the specificity, only the primer sets targeting the
uidA gene were 100% specific although the primer sets targeting 16S rRNA,
phoE, and
tuf genes only amplified
Escherichia fergusonii as non-specific target. Finally, the primer set targeting the 16S-ITS-23S gene region, was not specific as it amplified DNA from many other
Enterobacteriaceae species. In summary, only the assay targeting the
tuf gene detected all
E. coli/
Shigella strains tested in this study. However, if it becomes important to discriminate between
E. coli and
E. fergusonii, assays targeting the
uidA gene would represent a good choice although none of them were totally ubiquitous to detect of the presence of
Shigella strains. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.017 |