Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets

Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 (V2.2) and CloudSat R04 (release 4) ice water content (IWC) and partial‐column ice water path (pIWP) measurements are analyzed and compared to other correlative data sets. The MLS IWC, representing an average over ∼300 × 7 × 4 km3 volume, is retrieved at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2009-04, Vol.114 (D8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Wu, D. L., Austin, R. T., Deng, M., Durden, S. L., Heymsfield, A. J., Jiang, J. H., Lambert, A., Li, J.-L., Livesey, N. J., McFarquhar, G. M., Pittman, J. V., Stephens, G. L., Tanelli, S., Vane, D. G., Waliser, D. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres
container_volume 114
creator Wu, D. L.
Austin, R. T.
Deng, M.
Durden, S. L.
Heymsfield, A. J.
Jiang, J. H.
Lambert, A.
Li, J.-L.
Livesey, N. J.
McFarquhar, G. M.
Pittman, J. V.
Stephens, G. L.
Tanelli, S.
Vane, D. G.
Waliser, D. E.
description Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 (V2.2) and CloudSat R04 (release 4) ice water content (IWC) and partial‐column ice water path (pIWP) measurements are analyzed and compared to other correlative data sets. The MLS IWC, representing an average over ∼300 × 7 × 4 km3 volume, is retrieved at 215–268 hPa with precision varying between 0.06 and 1 mg/m3. The MLS pIWP products, representing the partial columns over ∼100 × 7 km2 area with the bottom at ∼8, ∼6, and ∼11 km for 115, 240, and 640 GHz, have estimated precisions of 5, 1.5, and 0.8 g/m2, respectively. CloudSat, on the other hand, shows a minimum detectable sensitivity of −31 dBZ in the reflectivity measurement at 94 GHz. CloudSat IWC is an average over ∼1.8 × 1.4 × 0.5 km3 volume, and its precision varies from 0.4 mg/m3 at 8 km to 1.6 mg/m3 at 12 km. The estimated single‐profile precision for CloudSat IWP is ∼9 g/m2. However, these measurements are associated with relatively large systematic error, mostly due to uncertainties in the retrieval assumptions about microphysics, which lead to relatively poor accuracy compared to measurement precision. To characterize systematic differences among various observations and those derived from models, we employ the normalized probability density function (pdf) in the comparisons. CloudSat IWC shows generally consistent slopes of pdf distribution with in situ observations, particularly at ∼12 km where the in situ data come mostly from long‐leg flights. Despite similar IWC morphology found between MLS and CloudSat observations, CloudSat R04 IWC retrieval is higher compared to MLS, especially at 14–17 km where the MLS technique is not limited by sensitivity saturation. The MLS and CloudSat IWC pdf's agree well in the overlapped sensitivity range with relative difference
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008JD009946
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903628966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20554619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4774-cca2393690c28ae5c45a6f347fee46c97ff44d22cce2896c5e50c765bde088983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1PGzEQBmCrAqlRyK0_wKf2ki2z_vYRJSUlCh-CVpV6sYx3tlq6iYO9gebfs1EQ6inMZaTR885hhpBPJXwtgdlTBmDmUwBrhfpABqyUqmAM2BEZQClMAYzpj2SU8wP0JaQSUA7I5SQu1z41Oa4yjTX908Z739LQxk1Fm4C0TnFJLxd3YzrZze58N6Z-VdEQU8LWd80T0sp3nmbs8gk5rn2bcfTah-Tn-bcfk-_F4np2MTlbFEFoLYoQPOOWKwuBGY8yCOlVzYWuEYUKVte1EBVjISAzVgWJEoJW8r5CMMYaPiRf9nvXKT5uMHdu2eSAbetXGDfZWeBql1S9_HxQciFAc2PehQykFKq0PRzvYUgx54S1W6dm6dPWleB2n3D_f6LnfM-fmxa3B62bz26n5e5CfarYp5rc4b-3lE9_ndJcS_fraubY9GZxBbPfTvIXHZqW7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20554619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wu, D. L. ; Austin, R. T. ; Deng, M. ; Durden, S. L. ; Heymsfield, A. J. ; Jiang, J. H. ; Lambert, A. ; Li, J.-L. ; Livesey, N. J. ; McFarquhar, G. M. ; Pittman, J. V. ; Stephens, G. L. ; Tanelli, S. ; Vane, D. G. ; Waliser, D. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, D. L. ; Austin, R. T. ; Deng, M. ; Durden, S. L. ; Heymsfield, A. J. ; Jiang, J. H. ; Lambert, A. ; Li, J.-L. ; Livesey, N. J. ; McFarquhar, G. M. ; Pittman, J. V. ; Stephens, G. L. ; Tanelli, S. ; Vane, D. G. ; Waliser, D. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 (V2.2) and CloudSat R04 (release 4) ice water content (IWC) and partial‐column ice water path (pIWP) measurements are analyzed and compared to other correlative data sets. The MLS IWC, representing an average over ∼300 × 7 × 4 km3 volume, is retrieved at 215–268 hPa with precision varying between 0.06 and 1 mg/m3. The MLS pIWP products, representing the partial columns over ∼100 × 7 km2 area with the bottom at ∼8, ∼6, and ∼11 km for 115, 240, and 640 GHz, have estimated precisions of 5, 1.5, and 0.8 g/m2, respectively. CloudSat, on the other hand, shows a minimum detectable sensitivity of −31 dBZ in the reflectivity measurement at 94 GHz. CloudSat IWC is an average over ∼1.8 × 1.4 × 0.5 km3 volume, and its precision varies from 0.4 mg/m3 at 8 km to 1.6 mg/m3 at 12 km. The estimated single‐profile precision for CloudSat IWP is ∼9 g/m2. However, these measurements are associated with relatively large systematic error, mostly due to uncertainties in the retrieval assumptions about microphysics, which lead to relatively poor accuracy compared to measurement precision. To characterize systematic differences among various observations and those derived from models, we employ the normalized probability density function (pdf) in the comparisons. CloudSat IWC shows generally consistent slopes of pdf distribution with in situ observations, particularly at ∼12 km where the in situ data come mostly from long‐leg flights. Despite similar IWC morphology found between MLS and CloudSat observations, CloudSat R04 IWC retrieval is higher compared to MLS, especially at 14–17 km where the MLS technique is not limited by sensitivity saturation. The MLS and CloudSat IWC pdf's agree well in the overlapped sensitivity range with relative difference &lt;50%, but the difference appears to increase with IWC. MLS and CloudSat cloud ice measurements are compared with other data sets in terms of monthly map and pdf. Comparisons with European Center for Medium range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) analyses show that grid box averages of monthly ECMWF IWC are much smaller (by ∼5× and ∼20×) than the same MLS and CloudSat averages. Comparisons of pIWP data from CloudSat and passive sensors reveal large uncertainties associated with passive techniques, such as penetration depth and sensitivity limitation. In particular, retrievals from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit‐B (AMSU‐B) differ largely in IWP pdf from the CloudSat R04 retrieval, showing CloudSat values generally lower (by ∼5× and ∼8×, respectively) at IWP = 10–500 g/m2 but higher at IWP &gt; 500 g/m2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2008JD009946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cloud ice ; microwave ; remote sensing</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2009-04, Vol.114 (D8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4774-cca2393690c28ae5c45a6f347fee46c97ff44d22cce2896c5e50c765bde088983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4774-cca2393690c28ae5c45a6f347fee46c97ff44d22cce2896c5e50c765bde088983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2008JD009946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2008JD009946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durden, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livesey, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarquhar, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittman, J. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanelli, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vane, D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waliser, D. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 (V2.2) and CloudSat R04 (release 4) ice water content (IWC) and partial‐column ice water path (pIWP) measurements are analyzed and compared to other correlative data sets. The MLS IWC, representing an average over ∼300 × 7 × 4 km3 volume, is retrieved at 215–268 hPa with precision varying between 0.06 and 1 mg/m3. The MLS pIWP products, representing the partial columns over ∼100 × 7 km2 area with the bottom at ∼8, ∼6, and ∼11 km for 115, 240, and 640 GHz, have estimated precisions of 5, 1.5, and 0.8 g/m2, respectively. CloudSat, on the other hand, shows a minimum detectable sensitivity of −31 dBZ in the reflectivity measurement at 94 GHz. CloudSat IWC is an average over ∼1.8 × 1.4 × 0.5 km3 volume, and its precision varies from 0.4 mg/m3 at 8 km to 1.6 mg/m3 at 12 km. The estimated single‐profile precision for CloudSat IWP is ∼9 g/m2. However, these measurements are associated with relatively large systematic error, mostly due to uncertainties in the retrieval assumptions about microphysics, which lead to relatively poor accuracy compared to measurement precision. To characterize systematic differences among various observations and those derived from models, we employ the normalized probability density function (pdf) in the comparisons. CloudSat IWC shows generally consistent slopes of pdf distribution with in situ observations, particularly at ∼12 km where the in situ data come mostly from long‐leg flights. Despite similar IWC morphology found between MLS and CloudSat observations, CloudSat R04 IWC retrieval is higher compared to MLS, especially at 14–17 km where the MLS technique is not limited by sensitivity saturation. The MLS and CloudSat IWC pdf's agree well in the overlapped sensitivity range with relative difference &lt;50%, but the difference appears to increase with IWC. MLS and CloudSat cloud ice measurements are compared with other data sets in terms of monthly map and pdf. Comparisons with European Center for Medium range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) analyses show that grid box averages of monthly ECMWF IWC are much smaller (by ∼5× and ∼20×) than the same MLS and CloudSat averages. Comparisons of pIWP data from CloudSat and passive sensors reveal large uncertainties associated with passive techniques, such as penetration depth and sensitivity limitation. In particular, retrievals from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit‐B (AMSU‐B) differ largely in IWP pdf from the CloudSat R04 retrieval, showing CloudSat values generally lower (by ∼5× and ∼8×, respectively) at IWP = 10–500 g/m2 but higher at IWP &gt; 500 g/m2.</description><subject>cloud ice</subject><subject>microwave</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1PGzEQBmCrAqlRyK0_wKf2ki2z_vYRJSUlCh-CVpV6sYx3tlq6iYO9gebfs1EQ6inMZaTR885hhpBPJXwtgdlTBmDmUwBrhfpABqyUqmAM2BEZQClMAYzpj2SU8wP0JaQSUA7I5SQu1z41Oa4yjTX908Z739LQxk1Fm4C0TnFJLxd3YzrZze58N6Z-VdEQU8LWd80T0sp3nmbs8gk5rn2bcfTah-Tn-bcfk-_F4np2MTlbFEFoLYoQPOOWKwuBGY8yCOlVzYWuEYUKVte1EBVjISAzVgWJEoJW8r5CMMYaPiRf9nvXKT5uMHdu2eSAbetXGDfZWeBql1S9_HxQciFAc2PehQykFKq0PRzvYUgx54S1W6dm6dPWleB2n3D_f6LnfM-fmxa3B62bz26n5e5CfarYp5rc4b-3lE9_ndJcS_fraubY9GZxBbPfTvIXHZqW7w</recordid><startdate>20090427</startdate><enddate>20090427</enddate><creator>Wu, D. L.</creator><creator>Austin, R. T.</creator><creator>Deng, M.</creator><creator>Durden, S. L.</creator><creator>Heymsfield, A. J.</creator><creator>Jiang, J. H.</creator><creator>Lambert, A.</creator><creator>Li, J.-L.</creator><creator>Livesey, N. J.</creator><creator>McFarquhar, G. M.</creator><creator>Pittman, J. V.</creator><creator>Stephens, G. L.</creator><creator>Tanelli, S.</creator><creator>Vane, D. G.</creator><creator>Waliser, D. E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090427</creationdate><title>Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets</title><author>Wu, D. L. ; Austin, R. T. ; Deng, M. ; Durden, S. L. ; Heymsfield, A. J. ; Jiang, J. H. ; Lambert, A. ; Li, J.-L. ; Livesey, N. J. ; McFarquhar, G. M. ; Pittman, J. V. ; Stephens, G. L. ; Tanelli, S. ; Vane, D. G. ; Waliser, D. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4774-cca2393690c28ae5c45a6f347fee46c97ff44d22cce2896c5e50c765bde088983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>cloud ice</topic><topic>microwave</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durden, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, J.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livesey, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarquhar, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittman, J. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanelli, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vane, D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waliser, D. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, D. L.</au><au>Austin, R. T.</au><au>Deng, M.</au><au>Durden, S. L.</au><au>Heymsfield, A. J.</au><au>Jiang, J. H.</au><au>Lambert, A.</au><au>Li, J.-L.</au><au>Livesey, N. J.</au><au>McFarquhar, G. M.</au><au>Pittman, J. V.</au><au>Stephens, G. L.</au><au>Tanelli, S.</au><au>Vane, D. G.</au><au>Waliser, D. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2009-04-27</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>D8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 (V2.2) and CloudSat R04 (release 4) ice water content (IWC) and partial‐column ice water path (pIWP) measurements are analyzed and compared to other correlative data sets. The MLS IWC, representing an average over ∼300 × 7 × 4 km3 volume, is retrieved at 215–268 hPa with precision varying between 0.06 and 1 mg/m3. The MLS pIWP products, representing the partial columns over ∼100 × 7 km2 area with the bottom at ∼8, ∼6, and ∼11 km for 115, 240, and 640 GHz, have estimated precisions of 5, 1.5, and 0.8 g/m2, respectively. CloudSat, on the other hand, shows a minimum detectable sensitivity of −31 dBZ in the reflectivity measurement at 94 GHz. CloudSat IWC is an average over ∼1.8 × 1.4 × 0.5 km3 volume, and its precision varies from 0.4 mg/m3 at 8 km to 1.6 mg/m3 at 12 km. The estimated single‐profile precision for CloudSat IWP is ∼9 g/m2. However, these measurements are associated with relatively large systematic error, mostly due to uncertainties in the retrieval assumptions about microphysics, which lead to relatively poor accuracy compared to measurement precision. To characterize systematic differences among various observations and those derived from models, we employ the normalized probability density function (pdf) in the comparisons. CloudSat IWC shows generally consistent slopes of pdf distribution with in situ observations, particularly at ∼12 km where the in situ data come mostly from long‐leg flights. Despite similar IWC morphology found between MLS and CloudSat observations, CloudSat R04 IWC retrieval is higher compared to MLS, especially at 14–17 km where the MLS technique is not limited by sensitivity saturation. The MLS and CloudSat IWC pdf's agree well in the overlapped sensitivity range with relative difference &lt;50%, but the difference appears to increase with IWC. MLS and CloudSat cloud ice measurements are compared with other data sets in terms of monthly map and pdf. Comparisons with European Center for Medium range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) analyses show that grid box averages of monthly ECMWF IWC are much smaller (by ∼5× and ∼20×) than the same MLS and CloudSat averages. Comparisons of pIWP data from CloudSat and passive sensors reveal large uncertainties associated with passive techniques, such as penetration depth and sensitivity limitation. In particular, retrievals from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit‐B (AMSU‐B) differ largely in IWP pdf from the CloudSat R04 retrieval, showing CloudSat values generally lower (by ∼5× and ∼8×, respectively) at IWP = 10–500 g/m2 but higher at IWP &gt; 500 g/m2.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2008JD009946</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2009-04, Vol.114 (D8), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903628966
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects cloud ice
microwave
remote sensing
title Comparisons of global cloud ice from MLS, CloudSat, and correlative data sets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparisons%20of%20global%20cloud%20ice%20from%20MLS,%20CloudSat,%20and%20correlative%20data%20sets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Wu,%20D.%20L.&rft.date=2009-04-27&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=D8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2008JD009946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20554619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20554619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true