Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine
Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher K d values for soils with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2009-07, Vol.76 (4), p.558-564 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 564 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 558 |
| container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara Ong, Say Kee Moorman, Thomas B. |
| description | Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher
K
d values for soils with higher OC and lower
K
d values as the pH increased. However, OC was found to be the more dominant parameter. Linear partition coefficients at pH 5.5 were found to be 0.58
±
0.17
L
kg
−1 for soil with 0.1% OC and 3.91
±
0.36
L
kg
−1 for soil with 3.8% OC. At pH 9, the
K
d values were found to decrease by more than 50% to 0.23
±
0.06
L
kg
−1 (soil with 0.1% OC) and 1.16
±
0.05
L
kg
−1 (soil with 3.8% OC). Hydrophobic sorption was probably involved for pH
<
7.4 (p
K
a,2
=
7.4 for sulfamethazine) due to the non-ionized form of sulfamethazine while surface sorption was probably involved for pH
>
7.4 due to the ionized form of sulfamethazine. This was confirmed by regressing the estimated sorption coefficients of cationic, uncharged, and anionic species against the soil properties. A stepwise linear regression model incorporating the anionic fraction of sulfamethazine ionization and soil properties were developed and were found to estimate the
K
d values of other studies using soils of different pH and soil properties. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.066 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903619011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653509002835</els_id><sourcerecordid>903619011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-eda3fe1673918dc0d5e442056619b7616ae3b1ba3cc55a097685cc9d9f4683113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeFvwDhQDkljO3YiY9lVWilShygZ8txxl2vkjjYWST49fWyK-BU9eIP6Xln7GcIeUehokDlx11ltziGNG8xYsUAVAWsAimfkRVtG1VSptrnZAVQi1IKLs7Jy5R2ADks1AtyThWvFUi2Ip-unEO7FMEVId6bydvCmtiFqTBTX8zXRT6l4Ie8xHnx-ZbJtB-cGXHZmt9-wlfkzJkh4evTviZ3n6--b67L269fbjaXt6WtFVtK7A13SGXDFW17C73AumYgpKSqaySVBnlHO8OtFcKAamQrrFW9crVsOaV8TT4c684x_NhjWvTok8VhMBOGfdIKeC4Ff8iLR0le15Q1XGRQHUEbQ0oRnZ6jH038pSnog2q90_-p1gfVGpjOqnP2zanJvhux_5c8uc3A-xNgkjWDi2ayPv3lGJWcMnEo9PbIORO0uY-ZufvGgPLDtKjM31qTzZHArPenx6iT9ThZ7H3Mw9N98E948AMNq6pu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34412735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara ; Ong, Say Kee ; Moorman, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara ; Ong, Say Kee ; Moorman, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher
K
d values for soils with higher OC and lower
K
d values as the pH increased. However, OC was found to be the more dominant parameter. Linear partition coefficients at pH 5.5 were found to be 0.58
±
0.17
L
kg
−1 for soil with 0.1% OC and 3.91
±
0.36
L
kg
−1 for soil with 3.8% OC. At pH 9, the
K
d values were found to decrease by more than 50% to 0.23
±
0.06
L
kg
−1 (soil with 0.1% OC) and 1.16
±
0.05
L
kg
−1 (soil with 3.8% OC). Hydrophobic sorption was probably involved for pH
<
7.4 (p
K
a,2
=
7.4 for sulfamethazine) due to the non-ionized form of sulfamethazine while surface sorption was probably involved for pH
>
7.4 due to the ionized form of sulfamethazine. This was confirmed by regressing the estimated sorption coefficients of cationic, uncharged, and anionic species against the soil properties. A stepwise linear regression model incorporating the anionic fraction of sulfamethazine ionization and soil properties were developed and were found to estimate the
K
d values of other studies using soils of different pH and soil properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19349062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Antibiotics ; antimicrobial agents ; Applied sciences ; Carbon - chemistry ; drug residues ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Kinetics ; linear regression models ; Models, Chemical ; Organic carbon content ; particle size distribution ; Pollution ; regression analysis ; Soil ; soil organic carbon ; Soil pH ; soil pollution ; soil solution ; soil texture ; Sorption ; statistical analysis ; sulfamethazine ; Sulfamethazine - chemistry ; Sulfonamide</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2009-07, Vol.76 (4), p.558-564</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-eda3fe1673918dc0d5e442056619b7616ae3b1ba3cc55a097685cc9d9f4683113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-eda3fe1673918dc0d5e442056619b7616ae3b1ba3cc55a097685cc9d9f4683113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653509002835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21631256$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19349062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Say Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher
K
d values for soils with higher OC and lower
K
d values as the pH increased. However, OC was found to be the more dominant parameter. Linear partition coefficients at pH 5.5 were found to be 0.58
±
0.17
L
kg
−1 for soil with 0.1% OC and 3.91
±
0.36
L
kg
−1 for soil with 3.8% OC. At pH 9, the
K
d values were found to decrease by more than 50% to 0.23
±
0.06
L
kg
−1 (soil with 0.1% OC) and 1.16
±
0.05
L
kg
−1 (soil with 3.8% OC). Hydrophobic sorption was probably involved for pH
<
7.4 (p
K
a,2
=
7.4 for sulfamethazine) due to the non-ionized form of sulfamethazine while surface sorption was probably involved for pH
>
7.4 due to the ionized form of sulfamethazine. This was confirmed by regressing the estimated sorption coefficients of cationic, uncharged, and anionic species against the soil properties. A stepwise linear regression model incorporating the anionic fraction of sulfamethazine ionization and soil properties were developed and were found to estimate the
K
d values of other studies using soils of different pH and soil properties.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>drug residues</subject><subject>Environmental Restoration and Remediation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>linear regression models</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Organic carbon content</subject><subject>particle size distribution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>soil pollution</subject><subject>soil solution</subject><subject>soil texture</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>sulfamethazine</subject><subject>Sulfamethazine - chemistry</subject><subject>Sulfonamide</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeFvwDhQDkljO3YiY9lVWilShygZ8txxl2vkjjYWST49fWyK-BU9eIP6Xln7GcIeUehokDlx11ltziGNG8xYsUAVAWsAimfkRVtG1VSptrnZAVQi1IKLs7Jy5R2ADks1AtyThWvFUi2Ip-unEO7FMEVId6bydvCmtiFqTBTX8zXRT6l4Ie8xHnx-ZbJtB-cGXHZmt9-wlfkzJkh4evTviZ3n6--b67L269fbjaXt6WtFVtK7A13SGXDFW17C73AumYgpKSqaySVBnlHO8OtFcKAamQrrFW9crVsOaV8TT4c684x_NhjWvTok8VhMBOGfdIKeC4Ff8iLR0le15Q1XGRQHUEbQ0oRnZ6jH038pSnog2q90_-p1gfVGpjOqnP2zanJvhux_5c8uc3A-xNgkjWDi2ayPv3lGJWcMnEo9PbIORO0uY-ZufvGgPLDtKjM31qTzZHArPenx6iT9ThZ7H3Mw9N98E948AMNq6pu</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara</creator><creator>Ong, Say Kee</creator><creator>Moorman, Thomas B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine</title><author>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara ; Ong, Say Kee ; Moorman, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-eda3fe1673918dc0d5e442056619b7616ae3b1ba3cc55a097685cc9d9f4683113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>drug residues</topic><topic>Environmental Restoration and Remediation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>linear regression models</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Organic carbon content</topic><topic>particle size distribution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>soil pollution</topic><topic>soil solution</topic><topic>soil texture</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>sulfamethazine</topic><topic>Sulfamethazine - chemistry</topic><topic>Sulfonamide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Say Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lertpaitoonpan, Warisara</au><au>Ong, Say Kee</au><au>Moorman, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>558</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>558-564</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher
K
d values for soils with higher OC and lower
K
d values as the pH increased. However, OC was found to be the more dominant parameter. Linear partition coefficients at pH 5.5 were found to be 0.58
±
0.17
L
kg
−1 for soil with 0.1% OC and 3.91
±
0.36
L
kg
−1 for soil with 3.8% OC. At pH 9, the
K
d values were found to decrease by more than 50% to 0.23
±
0.06
L
kg
−1 (soil with 0.1% OC) and 1.16
±
0.05
L
kg
−1 (soil with 3.8% OC). Hydrophobic sorption was probably involved for pH
<
7.4 (p
K
a,2
=
7.4 for sulfamethazine) due to the non-ionized form of sulfamethazine while surface sorption was probably involved for pH
>
7.4 due to the ionized form of sulfamethazine. This was confirmed by regressing the estimated sorption coefficients of cationic, uncharged, and anionic species against the soil properties. A stepwise linear regression model incorporating the anionic fraction of sulfamethazine ionization and soil properties were developed and were found to estimate the
K
d values of other studies using soils of different pH and soil properties.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19349062</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.066</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
| ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2009-07, Vol.76 (4), p.558-564 |
| issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903619011 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adsorption Antibiotics antimicrobial agents Applied sciences Carbon - chemistry drug residues Environmental Restoration and Remediation Exact sciences and technology Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Kinetics linear regression models Models, Chemical Organic carbon content particle size distribution Pollution regression analysis Soil soil organic carbon Soil pH soil pollution soil solution soil texture Sorption statistical analysis sulfamethazine Sulfamethazine - chemistry Sulfonamide |
| title | Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20organic%20carbon%20and%20pH%20on%20soil%20sorption%20of%20sulfamethazine&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Lertpaitoonpan,%20Warisara&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=558&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=558-564&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903619011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34412735&rft_id=info:pmid/19349062&rft_els_id=S0045653509002835&rfr_iscdi=true |