Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine
Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher K d values for soils with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2009-07, Vol.76 (4), p.558-564 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Batch sorption of sulfamethazine was conducted using five soils with organic carbon (OC) contents ranging from 0.1% to 3.8% and solution pHs ranging from 5.5 to 9. Sorption of sulfamethazine was found to be impacted by OC, soil surface area and soil solution pH, with higher
K
d values for soils with higher OC and lower
K
d values as the pH increased. However, OC was found to be the more dominant parameter. Linear partition coefficients at pH 5.5 were found to be 0.58
±
0.17
L
kg
−1 for soil with 0.1% OC and 3.91
±
0.36
L
kg
−1 for soil with 3.8% OC. At pH 9, the
K
d values were found to decrease by more than 50% to 0.23
±
0.06
L
kg
−1 (soil with 0.1% OC) and 1.16
±
0.05
L
kg
−1 (soil with 3.8% OC). Hydrophobic sorption was probably involved for pH
<
7.4 (p
K
a,2
=
7.4 for sulfamethazine) due to the non-ionized form of sulfamethazine while surface sorption was probably involved for pH
>
7.4 due to the ionized form of sulfamethazine. This was confirmed by regressing the estimated sorption coefficients of cationic, uncharged, and anionic species against the soil properties. A stepwise linear regression model incorporating the anionic fraction of sulfamethazine ionization and soil properties were developed and were found to estimate the
K
d values of other studies using soils of different pH and soil properties. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.066 |