Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles

Forty muscles from each of 20 beef carcass sides were used to perform Warner–Bratzler shear (WBS) force determinations for within and among muscle effects. The M. triceps brachii differed ( P

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meat science 2003-08, Vol.64 (4), p.507-512
Hauptverfasser: Belew, J.B., Brooks, J.C., McKenna, D.R., Savell, J.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 4
container_start_page 507
container_title Meat science
container_volume 64
creator Belew, J.B.
Brooks, J.C.
McKenna, D.R.
Savell, J.W.
description Forty muscles from each of 20 beef carcass sides were used to perform Warner–Bratzler shear (WBS) force determinations for within and among muscle effects. The M. triceps brachii differed ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902810423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174002002425</els_id><sourcerecordid>902810423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-c8253d39e7ddf54e8f5a9e93a35ce769f39f7ae18e5f9df19474195e2df732c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMsuBEEUhitCGMMjkN4IFs2p23TVShC3RGKBWFZqqk9FSU83Vd2TsPIO3tCTaDODpZzF2Xz_f04-QrYoHFCgo8Nb4KBzWgjYA7YPwATL5RIZUFXwXFCulsngF1kj6yk9AQDlTK2SNcZgxCkXA6IebKwxfr5_nETbvlUYs_SINmY4tVVn29DUKWt8JiAbN9NQYzbpkqswbZAVb6uEm4s9JPfnZ3enl_n1zcXV6fF17iSFNneKSV5yjUVZeilQeWk1am65dFiMtOfaFxapQul16akWhaBaIit9wZkTfEh2573PsXnpMLVmEpLDqrI1Nl0yGpiiIBjvSTknXWxSiujNcwwTG18NBfPtzMycmW8hBpiZOTOyz20vLnTjCZa_qR9JPbCzAGxytvLR1i6kv3Yx6gdUzx3NOex9TANGk1zA2mEZIrrWlE3455UvVH6IGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902810423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Belew, J.B. ; Brooks, J.C. ; McKenna, D.R. ; Savell, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Belew, J.B. ; Brooks, J.C. ; McKenna, D.R. ; Savell, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Forty muscles from each of 20 beef carcass sides were used to perform Warner–Bratzler shear (WBS) force determinations for within and among muscle effects. The M. triceps brachii differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the caput longum and caput laterale, and the M. gluteobiceps differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the vertebral, cranial, and caudal portions. The M. trapezius did not differ between the pars cervicalis and pars thoracica. Larger muscles were evaluated for location effects within muscles. The M. pectoralis profundus, M. infraspinatus, M. triceps brachii ( caput longum), psoas major, and M. semimembranosus all had significant location effects. Muscles were allocated into “very tender,” “tender,” “intermediate” or “tough” categories. Those muscles considered “very tender” (WBS <3.2 kg) were the diaphragm (outside skirt or wing of diaphragm), M. spinalis, M. infraspinatus, M. iliacus, M. psoas major, M. serratus ventralis, M. biceps brachii, M. obliquus internus abdominis, and M. vastus medius. Muscles considered “tender” (3.2 kg <WBS <3.9 kg) were the M. tensor fasciae latae, M. pectorales superficiales, M. teres major, M. longissimus lumborum, M. biventer cervicis, M. longissimus thoracis, M. splenius, M. subscapularis, M. rectus femoris, M. gluteus medius, M. gracilis, M. complexus, M. rectus abdominis, M. rhomboideus, and M. triceps brachii. Muscles classified as “intermediate” (3.9 kg <WBS <4.6 kg) were the M. gastrocnemius, M. supraspinatus, M. gluteobiceps, M. obliquus externus abdominis, M. semitendinosus, M. adductor, M. vastus lateralis, M. deltoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. transversus abdominis, and M. semimembranosus. Muscles classed as “tough” (WBS > 4.6 kg) were the M. extensor carpi radialis, M. trapezius, M. brachialis, M. pectoralis profundus, and M. flexor digitorum superficialis (hind limb). The diaphragm muscle was the most tender (WBS=2.03 kg), and the M. flexor digitorum superficialis was the toughest (WBS=7.74 kg). Tenderness, as measured by WBS, varied among and within bovine muscles, and knowledge of this variation allows for more appropriate use for specific purposes in the marketplace.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22063134</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MESCDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beef ; Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Meat and meat product industries ; Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards ; Muscles ; Tenderness</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2003-08, Vol.64 (4), p.507-512</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-c8253d39e7ddf54e8f5a9e93a35ce769f39f7ae18e5f9df19474195e2df732c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-c8253d39e7ddf54e8f5a9e93a35ce769f39f7ae18e5f9df19474195e2df732c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14646408$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22063134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belew, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savell, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Forty muscles from each of 20 beef carcass sides were used to perform Warner–Bratzler shear (WBS) force determinations for within and among muscle effects. The M. triceps brachii differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the caput longum and caput laterale, and the M. gluteobiceps differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the vertebral, cranial, and caudal portions. The M. trapezius did not differ between the pars cervicalis and pars thoracica. Larger muscles were evaluated for location effects within muscles. The M. pectoralis profundus, M. infraspinatus, M. triceps brachii ( caput longum), psoas major, and M. semimembranosus all had significant location effects. Muscles were allocated into “very tender,” “tender,” “intermediate” or “tough” categories. Those muscles considered “very tender” (WBS <3.2 kg) were the diaphragm (outside skirt or wing of diaphragm), M. spinalis, M. infraspinatus, M. iliacus, M. psoas major, M. serratus ventralis, M. biceps brachii, M. obliquus internus abdominis, and M. vastus medius. Muscles considered “tender” (3.2 kg <WBS <3.9 kg) were the M. tensor fasciae latae, M. pectorales superficiales, M. teres major, M. longissimus lumborum, M. biventer cervicis, M. longissimus thoracis, M. splenius, M. subscapularis, M. rectus femoris, M. gluteus medius, M. gracilis, M. complexus, M. rectus abdominis, M. rhomboideus, and M. triceps brachii. Muscles classified as “intermediate” (3.9 kg <WBS <4.6 kg) were the M. gastrocnemius, M. supraspinatus, M. gluteobiceps, M. obliquus externus abdominis, M. semitendinosus, M. adductor, M. vastus lateralis, M. deltoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. transversus abdominis, and M. semimembranosus. Muscles classed as “tough” (WBS > 4.6 kg) were the M. extensor carpi radialis, M. trapezius, M. brachialis, M. pectoralis profundus, and M. flexor digitorum superficialis (hind limb). The diaphragm muscle was the most tender (WBS=2.03 kg), and the M. flexor digitorum superficialis was the toughest (WBS=7.74 kg). Tenderness, as measured by WBS, varied among and within bovine muscles, and knowledge of this variation allows for more appropriate use for specific purposes in the marketplace.]]></description><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Tenderness</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMsuBEEUhitCGMMjkN4IFs2p23TVShC3RGKBWFZqqk9FSU83Vd2TsPIO3tCTaDODpZzF2Xz_f04-QrYoHFCgo8Nb4KBzWgjYA7YPwATL5RIZUFXwXFCulsngF1kj6yk9AQDlTK2SNcZgxCkXA6IebKwxfr5_nETbvlUYs_SINmY4tVVn29DUKWt8JiAbN9NQYzbpkqswbZAVb6uEm4s9JPfnZ3enl_n1zcXV6fF17iSFNneKSV5yjUVZeilQeWk1am65dFiMtOfaFxapQul16akWhaBaIit9wZkTfEh2573PsXnpMLVmEpLDqrI1Nl0yGpiiIBjvSTknXWxSiujNcwwTG18NBfPtzMycmW8hBpiZOTOyz20vLnTjCZa_qR9JPbCzAGxytvLR1i6kv3Yx6gdUzx3NOex9TANGk1zA2mEZIrrWlE3455UvVH6IGQ</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Belew, J.B.</creator><creator>Brooks, J.C.</creator><creator>McKenna, D.R.</creator><creator>Savell, J.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles</title><author>Belew, J.B. ; Brooks, J.C. ; McKenna, D.R. ; Savell, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-c8253d39e7ddf54e8f5a9e93a35ce769f39f7ae18e5f9df19474195e2df732c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Tenderness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belew, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savell, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belew, J.B.</au><au>Brooks, J.C.</au><au>McKenna, D.R.</au><au>Savell, J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>507-512</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><coden>MESCDN</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Forty muscles from each of 20 beef carcass sides were used to perform Warner–Bratzler shear (WBS) force determinations for within and among muscle effects. The M. triceps brachii differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the caput longum and caput laterale, and the M. gluteobiceps differed ( P <0.05) in WBS values between the vertebral, cranial, and caudal portions. The M. trapezius did not differ between the pars cervicalis and pars thoracica. Larger muscles were evaluated for location effects within muscles. The M. pectoralis profundus, M. infraspinatus, M. triceps brachii ( caput longum), psoas major, and M. semimembranosus all had significant location effects. Muscles were allocated into “very tender,” “tender,” “intermediate” or “tough” categories. Those muscles considered “very tender” (WBS <3.2 kg) were the diaphragm (outside skirt or wing of diaphragm), M. spinalis, M. infraspinatus, M. iliacus, M. psoas major, M. serratus ventralis, M. biceps brachii, M. obliquus internus abdominis, and M. vastus medius. Muscles considered “tender” (3.2 kg <WBS <3.9 kg) were the M. tensor fasciae latae, M. pectorales superficiales, M. teres major, M. longissimus lumborum, M. biventer cervicis, M. longissimus thoracis, M. splenius, M. subscapularis, M. rectus femoris, M. gluteus medius, M. gracilis, M. complexus, M. rectus abdominis, M. rhomboideus, and M. triceps brachii. Muscles classified as “intermediate” (3.9 kg <WBS <4.6 kg) were the M. gastrocnemius, M. supraspinatus, M. gluteobiceps, M. obliquus externus abdominis, M. semitendinosus, M. adductor, M. vastus lateralis, M. deltoideus, M. latissimus dorsi, M. transversus abdominis, and M. semimembranosus. Muscles classed as “tough” (WBS > 4.6 kg) were the M. extensor carpi radialis, M. trapezius, M. brachialis, M. pectoralis profundus, and M. flexor digitorum superficialis (hind limb). The diaphragm muscle was the most tender (WBS=2.03 kg), and the M. flexor digitorum superficialis was the toughest (WBS=7.74 kg). Tenderness, as measured by WBS, varied among and within bovine muscles, and knowledge of this variation allows for more appropriate use for specific purposes in the marketplace.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22063134</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 2003-08, Vol.64 (4), p.507-512
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902810423
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Beef
Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Meat and meat product industries
Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards
Muscles
Tenderness
title Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A26%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Warner%E2%80%93Bratzler%20shear%20evaluations%20of%2040%20bovine%20muscles&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Belew,%20J.B.&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=507-512&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft.coden=MESCDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902810423%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902810423&rft_id=info:pmid/22063134&rft_els_id=S0309174002002425&rfr_iscdi=true