Hollow fiber supported liquid-phase microextraction using ionic liquid as extractant for preconcentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes from water sample with gas chromatography-hydrogen flame ionization detection
► Ionic liquid-based HF-LPME used for preconcentration of BTEXs from water. ► Separation and detection is performed by GC-FID. ► LODs are better than or comparable with those of other methods. ► No carry-over interference or extraction solvent interference with the analytes. ► Simple, cheap and envi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hazardous materials 2011-10, Vol.194, p.24-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► Ionic liquid-based HF-LPME used for preconcentration of BTEXs from water. ► Separation and detection is performed by GC-FID. ► LODs are better than or comparable with those of other methods. ► No carry-over interference or extraction solvent interference with the analytes. ► Simple, cheap and environmentally benign.
A novel method has been developed for the analysis of benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene, and
o-,
m- and
p-xylenes (BTEXs) in water using hollow fiber supported liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) followed by gas chromatography-hydrogen flame ionization detection. Ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methy-limidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIM][PF
6]) was acted as the extractant for extraction and preconcentration of BTEXs from aqueous samples, and a porous-walled polypropylene hollow fiber was utilized to stabilize and protect [BMIM][PF
6] during the extraction process. Various parameters that affect extraction efficiency were investigated in detail, and the optimized experimental conditions were as follows: 8
μL of [BMIM][PF
6] as extraction solvent for the target analytes in 20
mL of sample solution, 30
min of extraction time, a stirring rate of 1400
rpm and 15% NaCl (w/v) in aqueous sample at 25
°C (ambient temperature). The recovery was found to be 90.0–111.5% with RSD (
n
=
5) of 1.3–5.4%, and the detection limits (S/N
=
3) were in the range of 2.7–4.0
μg/L. The proposed method was simple, cheap, rapid, sensitive and environmentally benign, and could act as an alternative to techniques for BTEXs analysis with expensive instrumentations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3894 1873-3336 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.066 |