Diagnostic Reference Levels From the ACR CT Accreditation Program

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the distribution of CT dose index (CTDI) values reported by sites undergoing ACR CT accreditation between 2002 and 2004. Methods Weighted CTDI (CTDIw ) values were measured and reported by sites applying for ACR CT accreditation, and the percentage of scan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2011-11, Vol.8 (11), p.795-803
Hauptverfasser: McCollough, Cynthia, PhD, Branham, Theresa, RT(R) (CT) (QM), Herlihy, Vince, MD, Bhargavan, Mythreyi, PhD, Robbins, Lavonne, BS, CNMT, Bush, Krista, RT(R) (M) (CT), MBA, McNitt-Gray, Michael, PhD, Payne, J. Thomas, PhD, Ruckdeschel, Tom, MS, Pfeiffer, Doug, MS, Cody, Dianna, PhD, Zeman, Robert, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the distribution of CT dose index (CTDI) values reported by sites undergoing ACR CT accreditation between 2002 and 2004. Methods Weighted CTDI (CTDIw ) values were measured and reported by sites applying for ACR CT accreditation, and the percentage of scanners with values above the 2002 ACR diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) was determined. Acquisition parameters for a site's adult head, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal examinations were used to calculate volume CTDI (CTDIvol ), and the average and standard deviation were calculated by year. Histogram analysis was performed to determine 75th and 90th percentiles of CTDIvol. Results Between September 2002 and December 2004, 829 scanners underwent the accreditation process. Volume CTDI values (average ± SD) for 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2002 to 2004, respectively, were 66.7 ± 23.5, 58.5 ± 17.5, 55.8 ± 15.7, and 59.1 ± 18.6 mGy for adult head examinations; 18.7 ± 8.0, 19.2 ± 8.6, 17.0 ± 7.6, and 18.4 ± 8.3 for adult abdominal examinations; and 17.2 ± 9.7, 15.9 ± 8.6, 14.0 ± 7.0, and 15.5 ± 8.4 for pediatric abdominal examinations. For 2004 data, 23.8%, 2.3%, and 6.9% of sites reported doses above the 2002 CTDIw reference levels, compared with 49.6%, 4.7%, and 15% for 2002 data for adult head, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal examinations, respectively. Seventy-fifth percentiles of CTDIvol were 76.8 mGy (adult head, 2002 only), 22.2 mGy (adult abdominal), and 20.0 mGy (pediatric abdominal). Conclusions From 2002 to 2004, average CTDIvol values decreased by 10.9, 1.7, and 3.2 mGy for adult head, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal examinations. Effective January 1, 2008, the ACR program implemented United States-specific diagnostic reference levels of 75, 25, and 20 mGy, respectively, for the CTDIvol of routine adult head, adult abdominal, and pediatric abdominal CT scans.
ISSN:1546-1440
1558-349X
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.014