The effectiveness of a disaster training programme for healthcare workers in Greece

BISTARAKI A., WADDINGTON K. & GALANIS P. (2011) The effectiveness of a disaster training programme for healthcare workers in Greece. International Nursing Review58, 341–346 Background:  Recent natural disasters have made disaster training a public priority. Multiple methods of disaster preparedn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International nursing review 2011-09, Vol.58 (3), p.341-346
Hauptverfasser: Bistaraki, A., Waddington, K., Galanis, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BISTARAKI A., WADDINGTON K. & GALANIS P. (2011) The effectiveness of a disaster training programme for healthcare workers in Greece. International Nursing Review58, 341–346 Background:  Recent natural disasters have made disaster training a public priority. Multiple methods of disaster preparedness training have been established in hospitals worldwide. Nevertheless, researchers have not yet discovered the most effective method for training hospital personnel in the area of disaster preparedness. Aim:  The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that a brief educational intervention would improve hospital staff knowledge about the hospital disaster plan and procedures. Methods:  A quasi‐experimental design was used. The intervention group included 56 professionals and the comparison group included 35 professionals in Greece. The intervention group attended a 5‐h course that addressed the basic principles of hospital disaster management. A structured questionnaire was used to estimate the participants' changes in knowledge. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), t‐test, one‐way ANOVA and chi‐square test were used to analyse the data. Results:  The intervention resulted in a significant improvement in knowledge. The mean score was significantly higher immediately after the intervention programme [86; standard error (SE): 2] than before (44.5; SE: 1.7) (P 
ISSN:0020-8132
1466-7657
DOI:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00898.x