Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients
Objectives To determine patient acceptability of barium enema (BE) or CT colonography (CTC). Methods After ethical approval, 921 consenting patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer who had been randomly assigned and completed either BE ( N = 606) or CTC ( N = 315) received a question...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2011-10, Vol.21 (10), p.2046-2055 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
To determine patient acceptability of barium enema (BE) or CT colonography (CTC).
Methods
After ethical approval, 921 consenting patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer who had been randomly assigned and completed either BE (
N
= 606) or CTC (
N
= 315) received a questionnaire to assess experience of the clinical episode including bowel preparation, procedure and complications. Satisfaction, worry and physical discomfort were assessed using an adapted version of a validated acceptability scale. Non-parametric methods assessed differences between the randomised tests and the effect of patient characteristics.
Results
Patients undergoing BE were significantly less satisfied (median 61, interquartile range [IQR] 54–67 vs. median 64, IQR 56–69;
p
= 0.003) and experienced more physical discomfort (median 40, IQR 29–52 vs. median 35.5, IQR 25–47;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-011-2154-y |