Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients

Objectives To determine patient acceptability of barium enema (BE) or CT colonography (CTC). Methods After ethical approval, 921 consenting patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer who had been randomly assigned and completed either BE ( N  = 606) or CTC ( N  = 315) received a question...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2011-10, Vol.21 (10), p.2046-2055
Hauptverfasser: von Wagner, Christian, Smith, Samuel, Halligan, Steve, Ghanouni, Alex, Power, Emily, Lilford, Richard J., Morton, Dion, Dadswell, Edward, Atkin, Wendy, Wardle, Jane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To determine patient acceptability of barium enema (BE) or CT colonography (CTC). Methods After ethical approval, 921 consenting patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer who had been randomly assigned and completed either BE ( N  = 606) or CTC ( N  = 315) received a questionnaire to assess experience of the clinical episode including bowel preparation, procedure and complications. Satisfaction, worry and physical discomfort were assessed using an adapted version of a validated acceptability scale. Non-parametric methods assessed differences between the randomised tests and the effect of patient characteristics. Results Patients undergoing BE were significantly less satisfied (median 61, interquartile range [IQR] 54–67 vs. median 64, IQR 56–69; p  = 0.003) and experienced more physical discomfort (median 40, IQR 29–52 vs. median 35.5, IQR 25–47; p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-011-2154-y