Long-term clinical outcomes of successful versus unsuccessful revascularization with drug-eluting stents for true chronic total occlusion

Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the long‐term clinical outcomes of patients with successful versus unsuccessful revascularization with drug‐eluting stents (DES) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). Background: The benefits of successful revascularization of CTO remain unclear. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2011-09, Vol.78 (3), p.346-353
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Seung-Whan, Lee, Jong-Young, Park, Duk-Woo, Kim, Young-Hak, Yun, Sung-Cheol, Kim, Won-Jang, Suh, Jon, Cho, Yoon Hang, Lee, Nae-Hee, Kang, Soo-Jin, Lee, Cheol Whan, Park, Seong-Wook, Park, Seung-Jung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the long‐term clinical outcomes of patients with successful versus unsuccessful revascularization with drug‐eluting stents (DES) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). Background: The benefits of successful revascularization of CTO remain unclear. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 333) with “true” CTO, defined as Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 on angiography and duration ≥3 months, were divided into two groups, those with successful (CTO success group, n = 251) and unsuccessful (CTO failure group, n = 82) revascularization with DES for CTO lesions. The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) the composite of death, Q‐wave myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: The CTO success group was significantly younger, with a higher involvement of LAD, and lower incidences of renal failure, previous myocardial infarction, and previous coronary intervention than the CTO failure group. After a median follow up of 1,317 days (interquartile range, 1,059–1,590 days), there were no significant between‐group differences in rate of MACE, both after crude analysis (9.4% vs. 11.8%, log‐rank P = 0.16) and after adjustment (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.47–2.88, P = 0.53). On multivariate analysis, major predictors of MACE were left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.23019