The evolution of Iberia during the Jurassic from palaeomagnetic data
A revision of Jurassic palaeomagnetic data from Iberia has been carried out in order to investigate the consistency between the palaeomagnetic information and the tectonic models proposed for the western Mediterranean. Due to the presence of a widespread (but partial) remagnetization which affected...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tectonophysics 2011-04, Vol.502 (1), p.105-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A revision of Jurassic palaeomagnetic data from Iberia has been carried out in order to investigate the consistency between the palaeomagnetic information and the tectonic models proposed for the western Mediterranean. Due to the presence of a widespread (but partial) remagnetization which affected most Jurassic sediments in Iberia, selection criteria have been designed to avoid completely remagnetized sites. A total of 72 sites have been considered for the palaeomagnetic discussion (35 sites from the Messejana–Plasencia dolerite dyke, 14 sedimentary sites from the Iberian Range and 23 sites from the Betic Cordillera). Three palaeopoles for Iberia have been selected (from the Iberian Massif and from the Iberian Range) for the period around 200
Ma, the Toarcian–Aalenian and the Oxfordian. Data from the Subbetic Zone (Betic Cordillera) are used to constrain the palaeolatitude of the Iberian microplate.
Iberian data are in general agreement with the BC02 master curve and the reconstruction parameters used to transfer the Iberian data to Europe, but lower palaeolatitudes than predicted by BC02 master curve are observed in Iberia for the Late Jurassic. Iberia reached a maximum in palaeolatitude during the Toarcian–Aalenian (the reference point of Madrid was at about 37°), and since then, the palaeolatitude decreased (Madrid was at 22° by the Kimmeridgian). Tectonic reference models for the Western Mediterranean (Stampfli and Borel, 2002, 2004) do not fit the Iberian declinations and palaeolatitudes. New palaeogeographic reconstructions are proposed for the Hettangian–Sinemurian, the Toarcian–Aalenian and the Oxfordian. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-1951 1879-3266 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.025 |