Biodrainage to combat waterlogging, increase farm productivity and sequester carbon in canal command areas of northwest India
Rise in groundwater table followed by waterlogging and secondary soil salinization is a serious problem in canal-irrigated areas of arid and semi-arid regions. To combat the problem, an agroforestry model for biodrainage was tested in waterlogged fields of Haryana (northwest India), where 10% area (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current science (Bangalore) 2011-06, Vol.100 (11), p.1673-1680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rise in groundwater table followed by waterlogging and secondary soil salinization is a serious problem in canal-irrigated areas of arid and semi-arid regions. To combat the problem, an agroforestry model for biodrainage was tested in waterlogged fields of Haryana (northwest India), where 10% area (0.44 m ha) is waterlogged resulting in reduced crop yields and abandonment of agricultural lands. In this model, four parallel strip-plantations of clonal Eucalyptus tereticornis (Mysure gum) were raised in December 2002 on four ridges constructed in the north–south direction in 4.8 ha canal-irrigated waterlogged fields of farmers. The strip-plantations were spaced at 66 m and each strip-plantation contained two rows of trees at a spacing of 1 m × 1 m, resulting in a density of 300 plants ha−1. Levels of groundwater table were measured over 3 years (April 2005–April 2008) in 22 observation wells installed in two transects across the strip-plantations. The groundwater table underneath the strip-plantations remained lower than that in the adjacent fields and the drawdown in groundwater table was 0.85 m in 3 years. The annual rate of transpiration by 240 surviving trees per ha was 268 mm annum−1 against the mean annual rainfall of 212 mm. The strip-plantations sequestered 15.5 t ha−1 carbon during the first rotation of 5 years and 4 months. Benefit–cost ratio of the first rotation of strip-plantations was 3.5 : 1 and it would be many folds for next 3 to 4 rotations due to negligible cost of coppiced Eucalyptus. Wheat yield (April 2008) in the inter-space of strip-plantations was 3.4 times that in adjacent waterlogged areas without plantation. It was mainly because of lowering of the water table and improvement in soil properties. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-3891 |