RNS-to-Binary Converters for Two Four-Moduli Sets {2n-1,2n,2n+1,2n+1-1} and {2n-1,2n,2n+1,2n+1+1}
In this paper, reverse converters for two recently proposed four-moduli sets {2@@un@ - 1,2@@un@,2@@un@ + 1,2@@un@+1 - 1} and {2@@un@ - 1, 2@@un@, 2@@un@ + 1, 2@@un@+1 + 1} are described. The reverse conversion in the three-moduli set {2@@un@ - 1,2@@un@,2@@un@ + 1} has been optimized in literature. H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. I, Regular papers Regular papers, 2007-06, Vol.54 (6), p.1245-1254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, reverse converters for two recently proposed four-moduli sets {2@@un@ - 1,2@@un@,2@@un@ + 1,2@@un@+1 - 1} and {2@@un@ - 1, 2@@un@, 2@@un@ + 1, 2@@un@+1 + 1} are described. The reverse conversion in the three-moduli set {2@@un@ - 1,2@@un@,2@@un@ + 1} has been optimized in literature. Hence, the proposed converters are based on two new moduli sets {(2@@un@(2@@u2n@-1)),2@@un+1@-1} and {(2@@un@(2@@u2n@-1)), 2@@un+1@+1} and use mixed radix conversion. The resulting designs do not require any ROM. Both are similar in their architecture except that the converter for the moduli set {2@@un@ - 1, 2@@un@, 2@@un@ + 1, 2@@un@+1 + 1} is slightly complicated due to the difficulty in performing reduction modulo (2@@un+1@+1) as compared with modulo (2@@un+1@-1). The proposed conversion techniques are compared with earlier realizations described in literature with regard to conversion time as well as area requirements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1549-8328 1558-0806 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TCSI.2007.895515 |