Clinical and Statistical Assessment of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Pharmaceutical Trials

In the past two decades, the potential association between the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior and the clinical use of pharmaceutical products has been debated among industry, regulators, and academia. A better understanding of the possible effects—favorable, unfavorable, or neutral—of pharma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2011-10, Vol.90 (4), p.554-560
Hauptverfasser: Gassmann‐Mayer, C, Jiang, K, McSorley, P, Arani, R, DuBrava, S, Suryawanshi, S, Webb, D M, Nilsson, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the past two decades, the potential association between the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior and the clinical use of pharmaceutical products has been debated among industry, regulators, and academia. A better understanding of the possible effects—favorable, unfavorable, or neutral—of pharmaceuticals on the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior may be required, especially for trials typically designed for other primary objectives. Here, a cross‐industry statistical team provides recommendations that address the assessment, statistical analysis, interpretation, and utility of suicide‐related data in pharmaceutical clinical trials. These recommendations are to evaluate suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and the two combined as end points; utilize standard scales to collect data prospectively; and analyze the data using several statistical methods. A more accurate assessment of the potential association between the use of pharmaceutical products and risk of suicide‐related events will contribute to estimating the benefit/risk ratio and result in safer medicines for patients. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2011) 90 4, 554–560. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.144
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1038/clpt.2011.144