Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture
Abstract Objective To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that inclu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2011-10, Vol.115 (1), p.5-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model. Results Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% CI 2.58–9.52, P < 0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21–1.16), compared with a double-layer closure. Conclusion Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013 |