The McIvor blade improves insertion of the LMA ProSeal™ in children
Background The McIvor blade, a tongue retractor with a thin curved blade, is used to improve the operating field during a tonsillectomy. We compared the success rate and incidence of complications between digital insertion and McIvor blade-guided insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA™) ProSeal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of anesthesia 2011-09, Vol.58 (9), p.796-801 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The McIvor blade, a tongue retractor with a thin curved blade, is used to improve the operating field during a tonsillectomy. We compared the success rate and incidence of complications between digital insertion and McIvor blade-guided insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA™) ProSeal™ when performed by anesthesia residents in children.
Methods
A total of 134 anesthetized non-paralyzed pediatric patients were included in the study. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups, i.e., Digital group (LMA ProSeal insertion using the digital insertion technique) or McIvor group (LMA ProSeal insertion using the Mclvor blade-guided technique). All patients were managed by anesthesia residents who were unskilled in using each technique. We assessed success rates of insertion at the first attempt, insertion time for an effective airway, and postoperative blood staining.
Results
The success rate of insertion at the first attempt was higher in the McIvor group than in the Digital group (97%
vs
78%, respectively;
P
= 0.003), and insertion time with a successful first attempt was shorter in the McIvor group than in the Digital group (20.5 [4.5] sec
vs
22.8 [6.7] sec, respectively;
P
= 0.021). The overall insertion time for an effective airway was also shorter in the McIvor group than in the Digital group (20.9 [5.7] sec
vs
26.0 [9.8] sec, respectively;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0832-610X 1496-8975 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12630-011-9540-4 |