A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy

Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 9...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2011-08, Vol.78 (2), p.257-260
Hauptverfasser: Seçkiner, Ilker, Sen, Haluk, Erturhan, Sakıp, Yağcı, Faruk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 257
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 78
creator Seçkiner, Ilker
Sen, Haluk
Erturhan, Sakıp
Yağcı, Faruk
description Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 90 agreed and provided informed consent. These 90 men were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received lidocaine, group 2 (n = 29) received tramadol, and group 3 (n = 31) received saline solution. Within 10 minutes of biopsy procedure completion, the patients were presented with visual pain scales and asked to rate the pain. The patients also asked whether they would be to return for this procedure if it became medically necessary. Results The postprocedural mean pain scores of lidocaine, tramadol, and placebo groups were found to be 1.73, 2.89, and 4.32, respectively. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in both the lidocaine and the tramadol groups compared with the placebo group ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893341112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009042951100272X</els_id><sourcerecordid>893341112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4721749412a8026cb0ee3ef4b1325dc7e37a9baf303ea676f7c607cc93d200293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCI4B8QVxIGdtJvL6Almr5I1VQsbsSN8u1J5W7TlzspFL3XXhXHLWAxIWTLes3842_b4riOYU5Bdq82c7HGHzYHOYMKJ0DnwOFB8WM1kyUUsr6YTEDkFBWTNZnxZOUtgDQNI14XJwx2gBlNcyKn5dkFUPaoRncHl-Tb7q3oXP3aMki9EOW8Pl6PYz2kB-6nY6u35Cls8Fo1yPJOLmJutM2eOJ6ssLodrnhoAdnyBeMeyTvfTB3eoOkDXGC-xSznPbk1g9RpzD2ttyMzmah1bE017iwS4enxaNW-4TPTud5cfvh6mbxqVx-_fh5cbksTSWqoawEo6KSFWX6Alhj1oDIsa3WlLPaGoFcaLnWLQeOuhFNK0wDwhjJLQNgkp8Xr4598-g_RkyD6lwy6L3uMYxJXUjOK0opy2R9JE2eNP-jVbvoOh0PioKaglFbdQpGTcEo4CoHk-tenBTGdYf2T9XvJDLw8gToZLRvs03Gpb9cVQGXvMncuyOH2Y-9w6iScdgbtG5yVdng_jvK2386GO96l0Xv8IBpG8bYZ7MVVYkpUNfTFk1LRGn2SrDv_BdsAMaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893341112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Seçkiner, Ilker ; Sen, Haluk ; Erturhan, Sakıp ; Yağcı, Faruk</creator><creatorcontrib>Seçkiner, Ilker ; Sen, Haluk ; Erturhan, Sakıp ; Yağcı, Faruk</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 90 agreed and provided informed consent. These 90 men were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received lidocaine, group 2 (n = 29) received tramadol, and group 3 (n = 31) received saline solution. Within 10 minutes of biopsy procedure completion, the patients were presented with visual pain scales and asked to rate the pain. The patients also asked whether they would be to return for this procedure if it became medically necessary. Results The postprocedural mean pain scores of lidocaine, tramadol, and placebo groups were found to be 1.73, 2.89, and 4.32, respectively. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in both the lidocaine and the tramadol groups compared with the placebo group ( P &lt;.001). In addition, statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups regarding how willing they would be to return for the procedure if necessary. Conclusions In this study, we showed that the local anesthetic effect of tramadol in decreasing pain in periprostatic nerve block during TRUS-guided biopsy. The use of tramadol for pain relief in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is a practical, effective, and comfortable method compared with the results of the control group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21601250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Lidocaine - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Nerve Block ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate - innervation ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Tramadol - therapeutic use ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2011-08, Vol.78 (2), p.257-260</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4721749412a8026cb0ee3ef4b1325dc7e37a9baf303ea676f7c607cc93d200293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4721749412a8026cb0ee3ef4b1325dc7e37a9baf303ea676f7c607cc93d200293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009042951100272X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24403936$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seçkiner, Ilker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erturhan, Sakıp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağcı, Faruk</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 90 agreed and provided informed consent. These 90 men were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received lidocaine, group 2 (n = 29) received tramadol, and group 3 (n = 31) received saline solution. Within 10 minutes of biopsy procedure completion, the patients were presented with visual pain scales and asked to rate the pain. The patients also asked whether they would be to return for this procedure if it became medically necessary. Results The postprocedural mean pain scores of lidocaine, tramadol, and placebo groups were found to be 1.73, 2.89, and 4.32, respectively. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in both the lidocaine and the tramadol groups compared with the placebo group ( P &lt;.001). In addition, statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups regarding how willing they would be to return for the procedure if necessary. Conclusions In this study, we showed that the local anesthetic effect of tramadol in decreasing pain in periprostatic nerve block during TRUS-guided biopsy. The use of tramadol for pain relief in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is a practical, effective, and comfortable method compared with the results of the control group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate - innervation</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Tramadol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCI4B8QVxIGdtJvL6Almr5I1VQsbsSN8u1J5W7TlzspFL3XXhXHLWAxIWTLes3842_b4riOYU5Bdq82c7HGHzYHOYMKJ0DnwOFB8WM1kyUUsr6YTEDkFBWTNZnxZOUtgDQNI14XJwx2gBlNcyKn5dkFUPaoRncHl-Tb7q3oXP3aMki9EOW8Pl6PYz2kB-6nY6u35Cls8Fo1yPJOLmJutM2eOJ6ssLodrnhoAdnyBeMeyTvfTB3eoOkDXGC-xSznPbk1g9RpzD2ttyMzmah1bE017iwS4enxaNW-4TPTud5cfvh6mbxqVx-_fh5cbksTSWqoawEo6KSFWX6Alhj1oDIsa3WlLPaGoFcaLnWLQeOuhFNK0wDwhjJLQNgkp8Xr4598-g_RkyD6lwy6L3uMYxJXUjOK0opy2R9JE2eNP-jVbvoOh0PioKaglFbdQpGTcEo4CoHk-tenBTGdYf2T9XvJDLw8gToZLRvs03Gpb9cVQGXvMncuyOH2Y-9w6iScdgbtG5yVdng_jvK2386GO96l0Xv8IBpG8bYZ7MVVYkpUNfTFk1LRGn2SrDv_BdsAMaI</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Seçkiner, Ilker</creator><creator>Sen, Haluk</creator><creator>Erturhan, Sakıp</creator><creator>Yağcı, Faruk</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy</title><author>Seçkiner, Ilker ; Sen, Haluk ; Erturhan, Sakıp ; Yağcı, Faruk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4721749412a8026cb0ee3ef4b1325dc7e37a9baf303ea676f7c607cc93d200293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate - innervation</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Tramadol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seçkiner, Ilker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Haluk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erturhan, Sakıp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yağcı, Faruk</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seçkiner, Ilker</au><au>Sen, Haluk</au><au>Erturhan, Sakıp</au><au>Yağcı, Faruk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>257-260</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 90 agreed and provided informed consent. These 90 men were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received lidocaine, group 2 (n = 29) received tramadol, and group 3 (n = 31) received saline solution. Within 10 minutes of biopsy procedure completion, the patients were presented with visual pain scales and asked to rate the pain. The patients also asked whether they would be to return for this procedure if it became medically necessary. Results The postprocedural mean pain scores of lidocaine, tramadol, and placebo groups were found to be 1.73, 2.89, and 4.32, respectively. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in both the lidocaine and the tramadol groups compared with the placebo group ( P &lt;.001). In addition, statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups regarding how willing they would be to return for the procedure if necessary. Conclusions In this study, we showed that the local anesthetic effect of tramadol in decreasing pain in periprostatic nerve block during TRUS-guided biopsy. The use of tramadol for pain relief in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is a practical, effective, and comfortable method compared with the results of the control group.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21601250</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.010</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2011-08, Vol.78 (2), p.257-260
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_893341112
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Double-Blind Method
Humans
Lidocaine - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Nerve Block
Prospective Studies
Prostate - innervation
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Tramadol - therapeutic use
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Urology
title A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A26%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective,%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study%20Comparing%20Lidocaine%20and%20Tramadol%20in%20Periprostatic%20Nerve%20Blockage%20for%20Transrectal%20Ultrasound-guided%20Prostate%20Biopsy&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Se%C3%A7kiner,%20Ilker&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=257-260&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893341112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893341112&rft_id=info:pmid/21601250&rft_els_id=S009042951100272X&rfr_iscdi=true