A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Lidocaine and Tramadol in Periprostatic Nerve Blockage for Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy

Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 9...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2011-08, Vol.78 (2), p.257-260
Hauptverfasser: Seçkiner, Ilker, Sen, Haluk, Erturhan, Sakıp, Yağcı, Faruk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To assess the efficacy of tramadol and lidocaine in reducing pain using the periprostatic nerve block technique with a spinal needle, guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before the biopsy application. Methods Of the 112 eligible candidates who were asked to participate in the study, 90 agreed and provided informed consent. These 90 men were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received lidocaine, group 2 (n = 29) received tramadol, and group 3 (n = 31) received saline solution. Within 10 minutes of biopsy procedure completion, the patients were presented with visual pain scales and asked to rate the pain. The patients also asked whether they would be to return for this procedure if it became medically necessary. Results The postprocedural mean pain scores of lidocaine, tramadol, and placebo groups were found to be 1.73, 2.89, and 4.32, respectively. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in both the lidocaine and the tramadol groups compared with the placebo group ( P
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.010