Effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial

Summary What is known and Objective:  There is little evidence from well‐designed randomized controlled trials of the impact of community pharmacist intervention on the clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes. It is also not known how sustainable any observed effects on glycaemic contro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 2011-10, Vol.36 (5), p.602-613
Hauptverfasser: Mehuys, E., Van Bortel, L., De Bolle, L., Van Tongelen, I., Annemans, L., Remon, J.-P., Giri, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary What is known and Objective:  There is little evidence from well‐designed randomized controlled trials of the impact of community pharmacist intervention on the clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes. It is also not known how sustainable any observed effects on glycaemic control are, over time. This study was initiated to address both these issues. Methods:  A 6‐month, randomized, controlled parallel‐group trial in 66 community pharmacies was conducted in Belgium. Patients were randomly assigned to receive usual pharmacist care (n = 135) or a predefined pharmacist intervention (n = 153). The intervention mainly focused on correct medication use, medication adherence and healthy lifestyle promotion. Primary outcome was glycaemic control, as measured by fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c. Sustainability of changes in glycaemic control was assessed by additional glucose measurements 18 months after the end of the study. Results and Discussion:  The intervention significantly reduced HbA1c (between‐group difference: 0·5%, P = 0.009). The largest impact on HbA1c was observed when pharmacotherapy changes (i.e., type and/or dose of hypoglycaemic agents) initiated by the physician were sustained with pharmaceutical care: HbA1c was reduced by 1·05% in the intervention group, whose medication was changed, compared with a reduction of 0·02% in the therapy‐modification only, group. It was also found that the diabetes education program resulted in improved self‐management and better knowledge of diabetes. Eighteen months after the end of the formal study period, the mean HbA1c of the intervention group did not differ significantly from the control group (7·4% vs. 7·2%). What is new and Conclusion:  This study provides new evidence, from a randomized controlled trial, of the beneficial effect of community pharmacist intervention in the clinical management of type 2 diabetic patients. However, questions remain about the sustainability of the observed improvements.
ISSN:0269-4727
1365-2710
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01218.x