Selected medical students achieve better than lottery-admitted students during clerkships

Medical Education 2011: 45: 1032–1040 Objectives  A recent controlled study by our group showed that the dropout rate in the first 2 years of study of medical students selected for entry by the assessment of a combination of non‐cognitive and cognitive abilities was 2.6 times lower than that of a co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2011-10, Vol.45 (10), p.1032-1040
Hauptverfasser: Urlings-Strop, Louise C, Themmen, Axel P N, Stijnen, Theo, Splinter, Ted A W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Medical Education 2011: 45: 1032–1040 Objectives  A recent controlled study by our group showed that the dropout rate in the first 2 years of study of medical students selected for entry by the assessment of a combination of non‐cognitive and cognitive abilities was 2.6 times lower than that of a control group of students admitted by lottery. The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of these two groups in the clinical phase. Methods  A prospective cohort study was performed to compare the performance of 389 medical students admitted by selection with that of 938 students admitted by weighted lottery between 2001 and 2004. Follow‐up of these cohorts lasted 5.5–8.5 years. The main outcome measures were the mean grade obtained on the first five discipline‐specific clerkships by all cohorts and the mean grade achieved on all 10 clerkships by the cohorts of 2001 and 2002. Results  Selected students obtained a significantly higher mean grade during their first five clerkships than lottery‐admitted students (mean ± standard error [SE] 7.95 ± 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.90–8.00 versus mean ± SE 7.84 ± 0.02, 95% CI 7.81–7.87; p 
ISSN:0308-0110
1365-2923
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04031.x