Neural Mechanism of Atrial Fibrillation: Insight from Global High Density Frequency Mapping
Frequency Mapping During Neurally Mediated AF. Background: It has been demonstrated that intrinsic cardiac autonomic activation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) exhibits a frequency gradient from the center to the periphery with limited mapping. Objective: We aimed to use a global mapping tool (Ensite Ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2011-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1049-1056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Frequency Mapping During Neurally Mediated AF. Background: It has been demonstrated that intrinsic cardiac autonomic activation of ganglionated plexi (GPs) exhibits a frequency gradient from the center to the periphery with limited mapping.
Objective: We aimed to use a global mapping tool (Ensite Array) to identify the frequency distribution and clarify the interaction between the extrinsic/intrinsic autonomic systems.
Methods: A mid sternal thoractomy was performed in anesthetized dogs. High frequency stimulation (20 Hz, 0.1 ms duration) was applied to locate the GPs and achieve vagosympathetic stimulation (VNS). There were 4 major GPs, which were located near the 4 pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, and a third fat pad (SVC‐Ao) GP that was located near the superior vena cava (SVC)‐right atrial (RA) junction.
Results: Without VNS (n = 12), the left atrial (LA) mean (8.20 ± 0.11 vs 7.95 ± 0.30 Hz, P = 0.04) and max (9.86 ± 0.28 vs 9.43 ± 0.29 Hz, P = 0.03) DFs were higher during the PV ostial GP stimulation than the SVC‐Ao GP stimulation. The LA max DFs were located not only at the primary GPs but also the nearby secondary PV ostial GPs. The RA mean DF (8.36 ± 0.05 vs 7.99 ± 0.19 Hz, P = 0.04) was higher during SVC‐Ao GP stimulation than PV ostial GP stimulation. The max DF was located inside the SVC during SVC‐Ao GP stimulation and at the RA septum during PV ostial GP stimulation. With VNS (n = 12), the LA mean and max DFs between the PV ostial and SVC‐Ao GP stimulation were similar. The DF distribution shifted to non‐GP LA sites during both the PV ostial and SVC‐Ao GP stimulation.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the AF was caused by an interaction between the PV ostial GPs during intrinsic autonomic stimulation, whereas the non‐GP LA sites were responsible for the AF induced by an extrinsic neural input. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1049‐1056, September 2011) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02029.x |