The effect of varying healing times on orthodontic mini-implant stability: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different healing times on the stability of titanium mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Study design Eight male beagles were used and randomized into 4 groups according to different healing times (1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks); each gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-10, Vol.112 (4), p.423-429
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Qiang, PhD, Zhao, Lixing, PhD, Wu, Yeke, PhD, Wang, Hui, MS, Zhao, Zhihe, DDS, PhD, Xu, Zhenrui, PhD, Wei, Xing, PhD, Tang, Tian, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different healing times on the stability of titanium mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Study design Eight male beagles were used and randomized into 4 groups according to different healing times (1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks); each group had 2 beagles. Sixty-four mini-implants were inserted bilaterally in the maxilla and mandible of the beagles. Microscopic computerized tomography (μCT) and pull-out test were used for morphometric and biomechanical analysis, respectively. Results All μCT parameters and Fmax (maximum pull-out force) increased with the prolongation of healing time. One week after insertion, all 4 measurements, namely osseointegration, trabecular bone volume density, intersection surface, and Fmax , were lower in the maxilla group than in the mandible group ( P < .05). Between the span of 1 and 3 weeks after insertion, a more obvious rising tendency of the 4 values was observed in the maxilla group than in the mandible group. Five and 7 weeks after insertion, the maxilla group expressed higher values of the 4 measurements than the mandible group ( P < .05). Conclusions Although insertion in the mandible could provide higher primary stability for mini-implants, with the prolongation of healing time, insertion in the maxilla achieves higher osseointegration. The results indicated that insertion in maxilla has a more positive effect on the stability of mini-implants than insertion in the mandible.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.10.042