Instrumentation as a source of variability in the application of fluorescence spectroscopic devices for detecting cervical neoplasia

We report on a study designed to assess variability among three different fluorescence spectroscopy devices, four fiber optic probes, and three sets of optical calibration standards to better understand the reproducibility of measurements and interdevice comparisons of fluorescence spectroscopic dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Biomedical Optics 2007-05, Vol.12 (3), p.034014-0340111
Hauptverfasser: Pikkula, Brian M, Shuhatovich, Olga, Price, Roderick L, Serachitopol, Dan M, Follen, Michele, McKinnon, Nick, MacAulay, Calum, Richards-Kortum, Rebecca, Lee, Jong Soo, Atkinson, E. Neely, Cox, Dennis D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We report on a study designed to assess variability among three different fluorescence spectroscopy devices, four fiber optic probes, and three sets of optical calibration standards to better understand the reproducibility of measurements and interdevice comparisons of fluorescence spectroscopic data intended for clinical diagnostic use. Multiple measurements are acquired from all sets of standards using each combination of spectrometer, fiber optic probe, and optical standard. Data are processed using standard calibration methods to remove instrument-dependant responses. Processed spectra are analyzed using an analysis of variance to assess the percent variance explained by each factor that was statistically significant. Analysis of processed data confirms statistically significant differences among the spectrometers and fiber optic probes. However, no differences are found when varying calibration standards or measurement date and time. The spectrometers and fiber optic probes are significant sources of variability, but appropriate data processing substantially reduces these effects. Studies of inter- and intradevice variability are important methodological issues for optical device trials and must be included in the quality assurance studies for the clinical trial design.
ISSN:1083-3668
1560-2281
DOI:10.1117/1.2745285