Notable size effects on very high cycle fatigue properties of high-strength steel
► Notable size effect was found in fatigue of steel exhibiting internal fracture. ► The size effect on internal fracture was much larger than that on surface fracture. ► Oxide-type inclusions were what caused the large-size effect. ► This result urged the use of large specimens in fatigue tests on h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2011-06, Vol.528 (15), p.5234-5240 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► Notable size effect was found in fatigue of steel exhibiting internal fracture. ► The size effect on internal fracture was much larger than that on surface fracture. ► Oxide-type inclusions were what caused the large-size effect. ► This result urged the use of large specimens in fatigue tests on high-strength steel. ► Evaluation of very high cycle fatigue considering the inclusion size were discussed.
Very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) properties were compared between two types of specimens: enlarged specimens and our standard specimens. Fatigue tests were conducted by ultrasonic fatigue testing; the material used was commercial spring steel. All tests ended in internal fracture, with large-size effects observed, i.e., the enlarged specimens showed lower VHCF strength than the standard specimens. Most of the internal fracture origins were oxide-type inclusions that were larger in the enlarged specimens than in the standard specimens, indicating the size effect to be caused by the difference in oxide-type inclusion sizes at the origins of internal fractures. The large-size effect strongly urges the use of large specimens when conducting VHCF tests on high-strength steel. Moreover, the large-size effect implies that fatigue strength cannot in this case be determined using the conventional
S–
N curve approach, since the
S–
N curve depends on the specimen size. The evaluation of the VHCF strength thus needs two steps: an estimation of the maximal inclusion size, followed by an estimation of the VHCF strength based on the maximal inclusion size. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-5093 1873-4936 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.082 |