Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging and ADC Mapping in the evaluation of residual Cervical Carcinoma after radiation therapy

Abstract Objectives The impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of MR imaging on the evaluation of residual Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Radiation Therapy, in addition to conventional MR images. Methods Fourty-nine women presenting with a uterine cer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2011-10, Vol.123 (1), p.110-115
Hauptverfasser: Levy, Antonin, Caramella, Caroline, Chargari, Cyrus, Medjhoul, Aicha, Rey, Annie, Zareski, Elise, Boulet, Bérénice, Bidault, François, Dromain, Clarisse, Balleyguier, Corinne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives The impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of MR imaging on the evaluation of residual Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Radiation Therapy, in addition to conventional MR images. Methods Fourty-nine women presenting with a uterine cervical cancer were examined with 1.5 T MRI and DWI, 8 (4–20) weeks after treatment. Treatment response was determined based on the histopathological results after therapy and was classified as a complete response (CR) or residual disease (RD). Post-treatment DWI and ADC results were compared. Results Five (11%) and 44 (89%) patients were considered as having histologically-proven RD or a CR respectively. The mean ADC of cervical tissue for all patients was 1.74 ± 0.324 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s and the SD was 1.94 ± 1.11 × 10 − 4 . The mean ADC was 1.62 ± 0.21 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s (SD = 1.45 × 10 − 4 ) for the 5 patients with RD versus 1.76 ± 0.33 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s (SD = 1.99 × 10 − 4 ) for the 44 patients with a CR (p = 0.09). Using 1.7 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s as a radiological cut-off value for the ADC, all patients classified as having histologically-proven RD had a mean ADC of ≤ 1.7 × 10 − 3 . In 12 (25%) cases, RD was suspected on T2-weighted MRI images alone. Eight of these cases were considered as false positives compared to the histological results. Their mean ADC was 1.98 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s and none of them had an ADC of < 1.7 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s. Conclusion Although our results were not statistically significant, ADC values could potentially be used to predict and monitor the response of uterine cervical cancer.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.009