Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging and ADC Mapping in the evaluation of residual Cervical Carcinoma after radiation therapy
Abstract Objectives The impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of MR imaging on the evaluation of residual Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Radiation Therapy, in addition to conventional MR images. Methods Fourty-nine women presenting with a uterine cer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2011-10, Vol.123 (1), p.110-115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objectives The impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of MR imaging on the evaluation of residual Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Radiation Therapy, in addition to conventional MR images. Methods Fourty-nine women presenting with a uterine cervical cancer were examined with 1.5 T MRI and DWI, 8 (4–20) weeks after treatment. Treatment response was determined based on the histopathological results after therapy and was classified as a complete response (CR) or residual disease (RD). Post-treatment DWI and ADC results were compared. Results Five (11%) and 44 (89%) patients were considered as having histologically-proven RD or a CR respectively. The mean ADC of cervical tissue for all patients was 1.74 ± 0.324 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s and the SD was 1.94 ± 1.11 × 10 − 4 . The mean ADC was 1.62 ± 0.21 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s (SD = 1.45 × 10 − 4 ) for the 5 patients with RD versus 1.76 ± 0.33 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s (SD = 1.99 × 10 − 4 ) for the 44 patients with a CR (p = 0.09). Using 1.7 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s as a radiological cut-off value for the ADC, all patients classified as having histologically-proven RD had a mean ADC of ≤ 1.7 × 10 − 3 . In 12 (25%) cases, RD was suspected on T2-weighted MRI images alone. Eight of these cases were considered as false positives compared to the histological results. Their mean ADC was 1.98 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s and none of them had an ADC of < 1.7 × 10 − 3 mm2 /s. Conclusion Although our results were not statistically significant, ADC values could potentially be used to predict and monitor the response of uterine cervical cancer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.009 |