Two hands are better than one: A new assessment method and a new interpretation of the non-visual illusion of self-touch

► A non-visual rubber hand paradigm elicits the illusion of self-touch. ► The participant’s two hands are involved: one administering, the other receptive. ► Change in proprioceptively experienced position of both hands was measured. ► Proprioceptive drift was greater for the administering than for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Consciousness and cognition 2011-09, Vol.20 (3), p.956-964
Hauptverfasser: White, Rebekah C., Aimola Davies, Anne M., Davies, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► A non-visual rubber hand paradigm elicits the illusion of self-touch. ► The participant’s two hands are involved: one administering, the other receptive. ► Change in proprioceptively experienced position of both hands was measured. ► Proprioceptive drift was greater for the administering than for the receptive hand. ► The result contrasts with previous findings of drift of the receptive hand. A simple experimental paradigm creates the powerful illusion that one is touching one’s own hand even when the two hands are separated by 15cm. The participant uses her right hand to administer stimulation to a prosthetic hand while the Examiner provides identical stimulation to the participant’s receptive left hand. Change in felt position of the receptive hand toward the prosthetic hand has previously led to the interpretation that the participant experiences self-touch at the location of the prosthetic hand, and experiences a sense of ownership of the prosthetic hand. Our results argue against this interpretation. We assessed change in felt position of the participant’s receptive hand but we also assessed change in felt position of the participant’s administering hand. Change in felt position of the administering hand was significantly greater than change in felt position of the receptive hand. Implications for theories of ownership are discussed.
ISSN:1053-8100
1090-2376
DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.021