Treatment of consecutive patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in the cooperating centres from the Czech Republic and the whole of Slovakia after 2000 - a report from the population-based CAMELIA Registry

Background: Most results on the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) with imatinib were obtained from clinical trials that may differ from the routine practice. We report the results of treatment of consecutive patients with CML at ten major centres during 2000–2008. Patients and methods: Da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of haematology 2011-08, Vol.87 (2), p.157-168
Hauptverfasser: Faber, Edgar, Mužík, Jan, Koza, Vladimír, Demečková, Eva, Voglová, Jaroslava, Demitrovičová, Ĺudmila, Chudej, Juraj, Markuljak, Imrich, Cmunt, Eduard, Kozák, Tomáš, Tóthová, Elena, Jarošová, Marie, Dušek, Ladislav, Indrák, Karel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Most results on the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) with imatinib were obtained from clinical trials that may differ from the routine practice. We report the results of treatment of consecutive patients with CML at ten major centres during 2000–2008. Patients and methods: Data reporting was retrospective in 2000–2004 and prospective from 2005 on. A total of 661 patients [301 women and 360 men; median age 51 (range, 15–83)] with Ph + CML were registered. The median follow‐up was 46.1 months (0–122.2). Results: Most patients were treated with first‐ (379; 57.3%) or second‐line (193; 29.2%) imatinib; some of the patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) (83; 12.6%), but 6.1% were treated with other modalities [40 patients; median age 66 (range, 32–83)]. The probability of overall survival (OS) at 5 years, according to Kaplan and Meier, was 88.9%, 77.5% and 68.7% for chronic‐phase patients treated with first‐line imatinib, second‐line imatinib and first‐line AHSCT, respectively, but only 25.2% for patients receiving other modalities. The OS was dependent on the disease phase and Sokal, Hasford and European group for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT) risk scores (P 
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01637.x