Characterization and Prediction of Prolonged Air Leak After Pulmonary Resection: A Nationwide Study Setting Up the Index of Prolonged Air Leak

Background The objective of this study was to better characterize prolonged air leak (PAL), defined as an air leak longer than 7 days, and to develop and validate a predictive model of this complication after pulmonary resection. Methods All lung resections entered in Epithor, the French national th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2011-09, Vol.92 (3), p.1062-1068
Hauptverfasser: Rivera, Caroline, MD, Bernard, Alain, PhD, Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel, PhD, Thomas, Pascal, PhD, Schmidt, Aurélie, MS, Bénard, Stève, PharmD, Vicaut, Eric, PhD, Dahan, Marcel, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The objective of this study was to better characterize prolonged air leak (PAL), defined as an air leak longer than 7 days, and to develop and validate a predictive model of this complication after pulmonary resection. Methods All lung resections entered in Epithor, the French national thoracic database (French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery), were analyzed. Data collected between 2004 and 2008 (n = 24,113) were used to build the model using backward stepwise variable selection, and the 2009 data (n = 6,813) were used for external validation. The primary outcome was PAL. Results of the predictive model were used to propose a score: the index of PAL (IPAL). Results Prevalence of PAL after pulmonary resection was 6.9% (n = 1,655) in the development data set. In the final model, 9 variables were selected: gender, body mass index, dyspnea score, presence of pleural adhesions, lobectomy or segmentectomy, bilobectomy, bulla resection, pulmonary volume reduction, and location on upper lobe. In the development data set, the C-index was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.72). At external validation, the C-index was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.72) and the calibration slope (ie, the agreement between observed outcomes and predictions) was 0.874 (
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.033