Verifiability and neologism-proofness in a Sender–Receiver game
► We consider fully revealing equilibria (FRE’s) of cheap-talk games. ► Verifiability of messages helps to support FRE existence. ► No longer true if equilibria are required to be neologism-proof. ► We construct an example to illustrate. This paper contributes to the literature on information transm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic behavior & organization 2011-08, Vol.79 (3), p.256-262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► We consider fully revealing equilibria (FRE’s) of cheap-talk games. ► Verifiability of messages helps to support FRE existence. ► No longer true if equilibria are required to be neologism-proof. ► We construct an example to illustrate.
This paper contributes to the literature on information transmission in Sender–Receiver games. We compare cheap-talk games to games with verifiable messages (
persuasion games). We consider equilibria in which the Sender’s private information (type) is fully revealed to the Receiver. We show that if a fully revealing perfect Bayesian equilibrium (PBE) exists when talk is cheap, then one also exists when messages are verifiable. We also show that this is not the case for
neologism-proof PBE’s. We construct an example in which full revelation can be sustained as a neologism-proof PBE outcome when talk is cheap, but not when messages are verifiable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-2681 1879-1751 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.033 |