The Isfahan cohort study: Rationale, methods and main findings

A 10-year longitudinal population-based study, entitled the Isfahan Cohort Study (ICS) is being conducted. The ICS commenced in 2001, recruiting individuals aged 35+ living in urban and rural areas of three counties in central Iran, to determine the individual and combined impact of various risk fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human hypertension 2011-09, Vol.25 (9), p.545-553
Hauptverfasser: Sarrafzadegan, N, Talaei, M, Sadeghi, M, Kelishadi, R, Oveisgharan, S, Mohammadifard, N, Sajjadieh, A R, Kabiri, P, Marshall, T, Thomas, G N, Tavasoli, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A 10-year longitudinal population-based study, entitled the Isfahan Cohort Study (ICS) is being conducted. The ICS commenced in 2001, recruiting individuals aged 35+ living in urban and rural areas of three counties in central Iran, to determine the individual and combined impact of various risk factors on the incidence of cardiovascular events. After 24379 person-years of follow-up with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, we documented 219 incident cases of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (125 in men and 94 in women) and 57 incident cases of stroke (28 in men and 29 in women). The absolute risk of IHD was 8.9 (7.8–10.2) per 1000 person-years for all participants, 10.6 (8.8–12.5) per 1000 person-years for men and 7.4 (6.0–9.0) per 1000 person-years for women. The respective risk of ischemic stroke was 2.3 (1.7–3.0), 2.3 (1.6–3.3) and 2.3 (1.5–3.2) per 1000 person-years. The risk of IHD was approximately 3.5-fold higher in the presence of hypertension, followed by diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia with near 2.5- and twofold higher risk, respectively. This cohort provides confirmatory evidence of the ethnic differences in the magnitude of the impact of various risk factors on cardiovascular events. The differences may be due to varying absolute risk levels among populations and the existing ethnic disparities for using western risk equations to local requirements.
ISSN:0950-9240
1476-5527
DOI:10.1038/jhh.2010.99