Integrating insecticides and Trichogramma ostriniae to control European corn borer in sweet corn: Economic analysis

[Display omitted] ► Research was conducted to determine the economic impact of using Trichogramma ostriniae as biological control for the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, in sweet corn. ► Egg parasitism by T. ostriniae was effective in reducing eclosion of O. nubilalis neonatal larvae, and the reduced larval eclosion generally translated into a positive economic advantage. ► Integrating T. ostriniae with insecticide provided the best control and best profitability. ► Projections indicate that three releases of T. ostriniae would provide the best profitability. We compared the economics of controlling European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis) in sweet corn by using the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma ostriniae, alone and integrated with insecticidal sprays. An initial experiment in 2003 compared T. ostriniae alone against insecticide alone and a second set of experiments conducted over 3 years (2006–2008) compared (1) insecticide alone [Insecticide]; (2) no insecticide, no T. ostriniae [Untreated Check]; (3) T. ostriniae alone [ T. ostriniae 1X]; and (4) T. ostriniae + insecticide [Integrated]. In 2007 and 2008, a fifth treatment was added consisting of three approximately weekly releases of T. ostriniae [ T. ostriniae 3X]. Parasitism of O. nubilalis eggs was higher in plots receiving T. ostriniae; O. nubilalis eclosion was lower with T. ostriniae; there was no interaction of T. ostriniae and insecticide on parasitism, O. nubilalis eclosion, or total O. nubilalis larvae at harvest time. Partial crop budgets were conducted for each treatment. In three of the 4 years, Untreated Checks had the highest sweet corn ear damage. Ear damage after a single release of T. ostriniae was statistically no different than using insecticides. In two of the three years, the Integrated treatment ( T. ostriniae 1X + insecticide) generated the largest increase in profitability. The insecticide only treatment generated the second best increase in profitability. When comparing a single release of T. ostriniae to the insecticide only, the latter provided a better combination of efficacy and profitability. The breakeven costs of the T. ostriniae justified their use relative to the Untreated Check treatment, but not when compared to the Insecticide treatment. The breakeven costs for T. ostriniae in the Integrated treatment exceeded the actual cost in two out of three years, suggesting again that conventional growers could benefit from integrating T. ostriniae with insecticidal t