Displaying random variation in comparing hospital performance

IntroductionThe role of transparency in quality of care is becoming ever more important. Various indicators are used to assess hospital performance. Judging hospitals using rank order takes no account of disturbing factors such as random variation and case-mix differences. The purpose of this articl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ quality & safety 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.651-657
Hauptverfasser: van Dishoeck, A M, Looman, C W N, van der Wilden-van Lier, E C M, Mackenbach, J P, Steyerberg, E W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionThe role of transparency in quality of care is becoming ever more important. Various indicators are used to assess hospital performance. Judging hospitals using rank order takes no account of disturbing factors such as random variation and case-mix differences. The purpose of this article is to compare displays for the influence of random variation on the apparent differences in the quality of care between the Dutch hospitals.MethodThe authors analysed the official 2005 data of all 97 hospitals on the following performance indicators: pressure ulcer, cerebro-vascular accident and acute myocardial infarction. The authors calculated CIs of the point estimate and the simulated CIs of the ranks with bootstrap sampling, and visualised the influence of random variation with three modern graphical techniques: forest plot, funnel plot and rank plot.ResultsStatistically significant differences between hospitals were found for nearly all performance indicators (p
ISSN:2044-5415
2044-5423
DOI:10.1136/bmjqs.2009.035881