Choice of living arrangements
Background The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method Data came from the Nati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 762 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 746 |
container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Stancliffe, R. J. Lakin, K. C. Larson, S. Engler, J. Taub, S. Fortune, J. |
description | Background The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA.
Method Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states.
Results Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived.
Conclusions In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878030906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ932669</ericid><sourcerecordid>1832245063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBoAiNmUz4fpe_y5YoKiUVhFIBcTS8jhOmTCZKXZS0rfHw5QsWKB6Y8vnO8fyPYxNOcx4WW_WM05KVqiNmSGUW-BEarZ_wCYH4SGbgFWiQkV0xJ7kvAYAxYV6zI6QA1okMWEv5t_7JsRpv5q2zU3TXU19Sr67ipvYbfNT9mjl2xyf3e3H7Ov70y_zD9Xi09n5_N2iChJBVVaQtsBlCFIs63olPfJgrUBdB4ooDPraayU8F2DtUigAxFqbGoNcgiA6Zidj7nXqf-5i3rpNk0NsW9_Ffped0QYILKhCvv4vyQ0hClnIe6BIEgyKIfXVP-i636WufNkZQ5YrRCyQGaGQ-pxTXLnr1Gx8unUc3FCLW7th-m6YvhtqcX9qcftifXmXv6s3cXkw_u2hAM9HIKYmHOTTC0uolC3y21H-1bTx9t7vuovzy-FU_NXob_I27g9-n344pUlL9-3jmbOXRn9eIJWw36_7rlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883916222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA.
Method Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states.
Results Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived.
Conclusions In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21029234</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; choice ; Choice Behavior ; community living ; Decision Making ; Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation ; Female ; Flats ; Group Homes ; Group Homes - statistics & numerical data ; Housing ; Humans ; intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Living arrangements ; Male ; Mental Retardation ; Nursing Homes ; Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Participation - methods ; Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data ; Place of Residence ; proxy respondents ; Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data ; Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; Residential Institutions ; self-report ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social support ; United States ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2010.01336.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2010.01336.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ932669$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21029234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakin, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA.
Method Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states.
Results Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived.
Conclusions In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>choice</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>community living</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flats</subject><subject>Group Homes</subject><subject>Group Homes - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Living arrangements</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Participation - methods</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Place of Residence</subject><subject>proxy respondents</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Residential Institutions</subject><subject>self-report</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBoAiNmUz4fpe_y5YoKiUVhFIBcTS8jhOmTCZKXZS0rfHw5QsWKB6Y8vnO8fyPYxNOcx4WW_WM05KVqiNmSGUW-BEarZ_wCYH4SGbgFWiQkV0xJ7kvAYAxYV6zI6QA1okMWEv5t_7JsRpv5q2zU3TXU19Sr67ipvYbfNT9mjl2xyf3e3H7Ov70y_zD9Xi09n5_N2iChJBVVaQtsBlCFIs63olPfJgrUBdB4ooDPraayU8F2DtUigAxFqbGoNcgiA6Zidj7nXqf-5i3rpNk0NsW9_Ffped0QYILKhCvv4vyQ0hClnIe6BIEgyKIfXVP-i636WufNkZQ5YrRCyQGaGQ-pxTXLnr1Gx8unUc3FCLW7th-m6YvhtqcX9qcftifXmXv6s3cXkw_u2hAM9HIKYmHOTTC0uolC3y21H-1bTx9t7vuovzy-FU_NXob_I27g9-n344pUlL9-3jmbOXRn9eIJWw36_7rlQ</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Stancliffe, R. J.</creator><creator>Lakin, K. C.</creator><creator>Larson, S.</creator><creator>Engler, J.</creator><creator>Taub, S.</creator><creator>Fortune, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><author>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>choice</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>community living</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flats</topic><topic>Group Homes</topic><topic>Group Homes - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Living arrangements</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Participation - methods</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Place of Residence</topic><topic>proxy respondents</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Residential Institutions</topic><topic>self-report</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakin, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stancliffe, R. J.</au><au>Lakin, K. C.</au><au>Larson, S.</au><au>Engler, J.</au><au>Taub, S.</au><au>Fortune, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ932669</ericid><atitle>Choice of living arrangements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>746-762</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>Background The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA.
Method Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states.
Results Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived.
Conclusions In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21029234</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762 |
issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878030906 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Adults choice Choice Behavior community living Decision Making Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation Female Flats Group Homes Group Homes - statistics & numerical data Housing Humans intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation Learning disabilities Learning disabled people Living arrangements Male Mental Retardation Nursing Homes Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data Patient Participation - methods Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data Place of Residence proxy respondents Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data Residential Institutions self-report Severity of Illness Index Social support United States USA |
title | Choice of living arrangements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choice%20of%20living%20arrangements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Stancliffe,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=746-762&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1832245063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883916222&rft_id=info:pmid/21029234&rft_ericid=EJ932669&rfr_iscdi=true |