Choice of living arrangements

Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the Nati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762
Hauptverfasser: Stancliffe, R. J., Lakin, K. C., Larson, S., Engler, J., Taub, S., Fortune, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 762
container_issue 8
container_start_page 746
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 55
creator Stancliffe, R. J.
Lakin, K. C.
Larson, S.
Engler, J.
Taub, S.
Fortune, J.
description Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states. Results  Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. Conclusions  In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878030906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ932669</ericid><sourcerecordid>1832245063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBoAiNmUz4fpe_y5YoKiUVhFIBcTS8jhOmTCZKXZS0rfHw5QsWKB6Y8vnO8fyPYxNOcx4WW_WM05KVqiNmSGUW-BEarZ_wCYH4SGbgFWiQkV0xJ7kvAYAxYV6zI6QA1okMWEv5t_7JsRpv5q2zU3TXU19Sr67ipvYbfNT9mjl2xyf3e3H7Ov70y_zD9Xi09n5_N2iChJBVVaQtsBlCFIs63olPfJgrUBdB4ooDPraayU8F2DtUigAxFqbGoNcgiA6Zidj7nXqf-5i3rpNk0NsW9_Ffped0QYILKhCvv4vyQ0hClnIe6BIEgyKIfXVP-i636WufNkZQ5YrRCyQGaGQ-pxTXLnr1Gx8unUc3FCLW7th-m6YvhtqcX9qcftifXmXv6s3cXkw_u2hAM9HIKYmHOTTC0uolC3y21H-1bTx9t7vuovzy-FU_NXob_I27g9-n344pUlL9-3jmbOXRn9eIJWw36_7rlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883916222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states. Results  Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. Conclusions  In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21029234</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; choice ; Choice Behavior ; community living ; Decision Making ; Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation ; Female ; Flats ; Group Homes ; Group Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Housing ; Humans ; intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Living arrangements ; Male ; Mental Retardation ; Nursing Homes ; Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Participation - methods ; Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Place of Residence ; proxy respondents ; Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Residential Institutions ; self-report ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social support ; United States ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2010.01336.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2010.01336.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ932669$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21029234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakin, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states. Results  Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. Conclusions  In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>choice</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>community living</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flats</subject><subject>Group Homes</subject><subject>Group Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Living arrangements</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Participation - methods</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Place of Residence</subject><subject>proxy respondents</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Residential Institutions</subject><subject>self-report</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBoAiNmUz4fpe_y5YoKiUVhFIBcTS8jhOmTCZKXZS0rfHw5QsWKB6Y8vnO8fyPYxNOcx4WW_WM05KVqiNmSGUW-BEarZ_wCYH4SGbgFWiQkV0xJ7kvAYAxYV6zI6QA1okMWEv5t_7JsRpv5q2zU3TXU19Sr67ipvYbfNT9mjl2xyf3e3H7Ov70y_zD9Xi09n5_N2iChJBVVaQtsBlCFIs63olPfJgrUBdB4ooDPraayU8F2DtUigAxFqbGoNcgiA6Zidj7nXqf-5i3rpNk0NsW9_Ffped0QYILKhCvv4vyQ0hClnIe6BIEgyKIfXVP-i636WufNkZQ5YrRCyQGaGQ-pxTXLnr1Gx8unUc3FCLW7th-m6YvhtqcX9qcftifXmXv6s3cXkw_u2hAM9HIKYmHOTTC0uolC3y21H-1bTx9t7vuovzy-FU_NXob_I27g9-n344pUlL9-3jmbOXRn9eIJWw36_7rlQ</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Stancliffe, R. J.</creator><creator>Lakin, K. C.</creator><creator>Larson, S.</creator><creator>Engler, J.</creator><creator>Taub, S.</creator><creator>Fortune, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Choice of living arrangements</title><author>Stancliffe, R. J. ; Lakin, K. C. ; Larson, S. ; Engler, J. ; Taub, S. ; Fortune, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5206-94379015cc54dbbf5a21c99427bc3e2482aba764a14099d460022b78b2c5d0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>choice</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>community living</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flats</topic><topic>Group Homes</topic><topic>Group Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Living arrangements</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Participation - methods</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Place of Residence</topic><topic>proxy respondents</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Residential Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Residential Institutions</topic><topic>self-report</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stancliffe, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakin, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stancliffe, R. J.</au><au>Lakin, K. C.</au><au>Larson, S.</au><au>Engler, J.</au><au>Taub, S.</au><au>Fortune, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ932669</ericid><atitle>Choice of living arrangements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>746-762</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states. Results  Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. Conclusions  In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21029234</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_878030906
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Adults
choice
Choice Behavior
community living
Decision Making
Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation
Female
Flats
Group Homes
Group Homes - statistics & numerical data
Housing
Humans
intellectual disabilities
Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation
Learning disabilities
Learning disabled people
Living arrangements
Male
Mental Retardation
Nursing Homes
Nursing Homes - statistics & numerical data
Patient Participation - methods
Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data
Place of Residence
proxy respondents
Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data
Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Residential Institutions
self-report
Severity of Illness Index
Social support
United States
USA
title Choice of living arrangements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choice%20of%20living%20arrangements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Stancliffe,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=746-762&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1832245063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883916222&rft_id=info:pmid/21029234&rft_ericid=EJ932669&rfr_iscdi=true