Choice of living arrangements

Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the Nati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2011-08, Vol.55 (8), p.746-762
Hauptverfasser: Stancliffe, R. J., Lakin, K. C., Larson, S., Engler, J., Taub, S., Fortune, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background  The rights to choose where and with whom to live are widely endorsed but commonly denied to adults with intellectual disabilities (ID). The current study provides a contemporary benchmark on the degree of choice exercised by adult service users in the USA. Method  Data came from the National Core Indicators programme. Participants were 6778 adult service users living in non‐family‐home service settings in 26 US states. Results  Most adults with ID did not participate in choosing where and with whom to live. Those with more support needs because of more severe ID and/or co‐occurring conditions experienced less choice regarding living arrangements. Individuals living in their own home or an agency‐operated apartment were more likely to choose where and with whom to live than individuals in nursing homes, institutions or group homes. However, few individuals with severe or profound ID chose where and with whom to live regardless of where they lived. Conclusions  In 2008, despite community‐living policies that emphasise choice, many adult service users with ID in the USA experienced little or no choice about where and with whom to live, especially those individuals with more severe ID. Our findings provide a clear endorsement of policies promoting more individualised living settings, such as one's own home or an agency apartment, because these settings do provide substantially more choice about living arrangements.
ISSN:0964-2633
1365-2788
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01336.x