Comparison of Medically Versus Surgically Treated Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients <80 Years Old Versus Patients ≥80 Years Old

Although recent progress in emergency surgery has resulted in an increase in the indication for older patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAD), some patients remain who cannot undergo surgical treatment and little is known about the prognosis of patients with AAD who receive medical treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2011-08, Vol.108 (3), p.453-459
Hauptverfasser: Yanagisawa, Satoshi, MD, Yuasa, Takeshi, MD, Suzuki, Noriyuki, MD, Hirai, Toshihisa, MD, Yasuda, Nobuyuki, MD, Miki, Ken, MD, Yasuura, Kenzo, MD, Horiuchi, Kazutaka, MD, Tanaka, Toshikazu, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although recent progress in emergency surgery has resulted in an increase in the indication for older patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAD), some patients remain who cannot undergo surgical treatment and little is known about the prognosis of patients with AAD who receive medical treatment, especially in elderly patients. Of the 82 patients with AAD who were admitted to our institution, 48 received medical therapy only. We retrospectively reviewed their clinical data and analyzed the prognostic value of the clinical characteristics in both younger and older patients. The in-hospital and 1-year mortality were significantly lower in the patients who underwent surgical treatment than in those who received medical treatment (6% vs 65%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.067