Evaluation of the Fate of Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin in Domestic Wastewater
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of sorption to the removal of two commonly used antibiotics (amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin) from wastewater. These antibiotics are excreted in large quantities with more than 75% of them being unmetabolized and are therefore likely to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2011-07, Vol.219 (1-4), p.191-201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The main objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of sorption to the removal of two commonly used antibiotics (amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin) from wastewater. These antibiotics are excreted in large quantities with more than 75% of them being unmetabolized and are therefore likely to end up in domestic wastewater in significant quantities. The specific objectives were to determine the sorption behavior in synthetic wastewater (SWW), the effect of pH and contribution of microbial surfaces, to the sorption of these antibiotics. The SWW, adjusted to various pH levels, was used and sorption kinetics conducted at 100 and 250 μg L
−1
concentrations. Adsorption isotherms were determined at different pH levels. The SWW (pH 6.6) was inoculated with
Rhodococcus
sp. B30 strain to determine the contribution of microbial surfaces to sorption. Generally, both antibiotics revealed a decrease in sorption with pH increase, suggesting that lowering the solution pH of the wastewater may reduce their amounts in wastewater solution. Comparatively, ciprofloxacin exhibited higher sorption than amoxicillin. The sorption distribution coefficient (
K
d
) values for ciprofloxacin ranged from 0.4356 to 0.8902 L g
−1
, with pH = 5.5 exhibiting the highest
K
d
, while that for amoxicillin ranged from 0.1582 to 0.3858 L g
−1
with the highest
K
d
at pH = 3.5. There was a significant difference (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11270-010-0697-1 |